[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by bjj20

According to public info published numerous places online, Gina, her brother and mother are listed as residents in a council flat (Islington). Some people have said her mother is not entitled to a council flat because she owned property in Chingford. Other people say Gina has claimed benefits. It is pretty easy to find addresses for these things online. I don't feel comfortable posting them here.

Pretty clearly Gina's mother does not live in millionaires row!

The mother is the key to this. If she is able to hand over £120,000 a year to her daughter out of her petty cash AND pay £18-20k a month in hotel bills AND let Gina use her credit cards, she must be a very wealthy woman indeed.

Find the mother and you find the truth!

[the_answers]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Pretty clearly Gina's mother does not live in millionaires row!

How can it be "pretty clear" when there's ZERO evidence ?

Originally Posted by bjj20

Zoopla said the home in Chingford purportedly owned by Gina's mother was sold in April 2013, but was available to rent in November 2012 for 550 pounds per month. It is a one bedroom home.

Evidence ?
Even if it's true (which I very much doubt) then so what ?
She could have a string of houses up and down the country.

Just because it's an "online source" doesn't mean it's even reliable either.
People can make claims all day long but without real proof, it proves nothing.

So all in all, what do these claims (whether true or not) prove ?
Nothing at all IMO.

Gina is a very real person.
If she shows her genuine and real side in the house then I come to the conclusion she's genuine and real outside.

Part of the reason Gina's fans admire and adore her so much is because she consistently SHOWED her standards, teamwork and loyalty in the house

She might be rich but she said:
"No-one was better than anybody else" - FACT !

As opposed to someone like Sam who was drunk, rude, arrogant and said:
"I've a really cheesey grin kind of makes me get away with anything."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMfszQX3iAA

Just because she's got money, doesn't mean she looks down on people just because she's got enough heart and balls to retain her own moral standards.
I don't necessarily agree with her about Hazel but can certainly understand WHY she didn't like her at all.

People could really do themselves a big favour by paying no attention to idle gossip and heresay backed up by nowt.

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by the_answers

How can it be "pretty clear" when there's ZERO evidence ?

Hardly zero evidence, if government information shows Gina and mum living in a council property!

Why would they be doing that if the mother is a multi-millionaire?

As I said find the mother and you find the truth. Apart from a recorded call played to the house - and clearly embarrassing Gina - mum has kept a very low profile, which is more than can be said about the boyfriend. Although Gina seemed a bit embarrassed when they played his BOTS rap!

[the_answers]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Hardly zero evidence, if government information shows Gina and mum living in a council property!

I've seen no real info or evidence you describe, only a claim it's true.
Like you said, "if".

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Why would they be doing that if the mother is a multi-millionaire?

Even if she DOES live there, does it prove she's NOT a multi-millionaire ?
She could have lots of property or it could be anything !
If we knew for sure I'm sure we wouldn't be guessing.
I'm giving it the huge benefit of doubt.

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

As I said find the mother and you find the truth.

Sorry but keep saying it doesn't make the argument any stronger.

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Apart from a recorded call played to the house - and clearly embarrassing Gina - mum has kept a very low profile, which is more than can be said about the boyfriend. Although Gina seemed a bit embarrassed when they played his BOTS rap!

People can have their best guesses and opinions but for me, there's just no real proof at all.

Anyway, really off this time so I'll leave you all to speculate.

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by the_answers

I've seen no real info or evidence you describe,

Just because you personally haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

"Seek and ye shall find"

[bjj20]

Originally Posted by the_answers

Even if she DOES live there, does it prove she's NOT a multi-millionaire ?
She could have lots of property or it could be anything !
If we knew for sure I'm sure we wouldn't be guessing.
I'm giving it the huge benefit of doubt.

I think what people are saying is that if you look at the mountain of small evidence, the wealth just does not add up to a family that has a grown child in mid-20s who has never ridden a bus or train; and also never eaten at a pub who only eats at five Michelin star restaurants and spends 68 thousand pounds in one shopping trip.

Even an ardent supporter of her supposed "wealth" would have to agree with that.

Surely you believe that there is some acting going on here. Right??