[CaudleHalbard]

Winning £100k purely because of a sympathy vote is nothing to be proud of.

Sam was a piss poor housemate. Even the Twins or Charlie winning would have been a better result.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Winning £100k purely because of a sympathy vote is nothing to be proud of.

Sam was a piss poor housemate. Even the Twins or Charlie winning would have been a better result.

He got the girl. At least he won something. His luck is in tonight.

[Marmalite]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Winning £100k purely because of a sympathy vote is nothing to be proud of.

Sam was a piss poor housemate. Even the Twins or Charlie winning would have been a better result.

....and yet if the Jack & Joe or Charlie had won all of these threads talking negatively about why Dexter should have won would have Sam's name removed and replaced with one of theirs.

However, no matter how many threads you or his fans make it still does not reflect that actual truth that Sam won purely due to the fact that he was a lot more liked and a hell of a lot more popular than any of the final 5, including your precious piss poor housemate Dexter who lied his way into the house and became a blubbering idiot within 1 week of entering the house!

Get over it!

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Marmalite

....and yet if the Jack & Joe or Charlie had won all of these threads talking negatively about why Dexter should have won would have Sam's name removed and replaced with one of theirs.

Get over it!

Actually that's bull****, because they actually contributed to the series and would've been hella lot more deserving than Sleepy Sam.

[Marmalite]

Originally Posted by reece(:

Actually that's bull****, because they actually contributed to the series and would've been hella lot more deserving than Sleepy Sam.

Yeah OK... if you say so

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Marmalite

Yeah OK... if you say so

Keep tarnishing people with the same brush, it will get you far in life.

[Marmalite]

Originally Posted by reece(:

Keep tarnishing people with the same brush, it will get you far in life.

Huh?

Tarnishing who with what brush?

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Marmalite

Huh?

Tarnishing who with what brush?

"All Dex fans would be making these threads against Charlie/Jack and Joe"

Yeah...

[Winkie Expand]

Originally Posted by reece(:

Keep tarnishing people with the same brush, it will get you far in life.

Someone has a new favourite saying.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Marmalite

Yeah OK... if you say so

Actually it's true, I'd have been satisfied with pretty much anyone this series winning other than Sam and Sophie (and Daley, obviously) because um...surprisingly they were actually a part of the series? Sam barely featured until the last 10 days, it's quite clear he didn't deserve to win. And I made this clear on numerous occasions in the two weeks leading up to the final that it was 'anyone but Sam' and I'd be satisfied, obviously you don't read enough posts.

I didn't even rate the twins that much but I'd have taken them winning over Sam any day.

Sam was the series bore and did nothing to warrant winning the series and the title of what is effectively the best housemate this year because um newsflash he categorically wasn't.

[DanaC]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Actually it's true, I'd have been satisfied with pretty much anyone this series winning other than Sam and Sophie (and Daley, obviously) because um...surprisingly they were actually a part of the series? Sam barely featured until the last 10 days, it's quite clear he didn't deserve to win. And I made this clear on numerous occasions in the two weeks leading up to the final that it was 'anyone but Sam' and I'd be satisfied, obviously you don't read enough posts.

I didn't even rate the twins that much but I'd have taken them winning over Sam any day.

Sam was the series bore and did nothing to warrant winning the series and the title of what is effectively the best housemate this year because um newsflash he categorically wasn't.

In your opinion. The things you are saying are not the last word on objective truth. No matter how many times you say 'actually' and 'true', you are still just stating your opinion.

In your opinion Sam was the series bore and did not deserve to win. fair enough. Not every body shares your opinion. That does not make them wrong.

[Jimrod]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Winning £100k purely because of a sympathy vote is nothing to be proud of.

Sam was a piss poor housemate. Even the Twins or Charlie winning would have been a better result.

Who votes out of sympathy exactly? I've never known anyone do that. I do know that decent, rational human beings don't vote for ******s though and that's why Dexter didn't win.

I hope he continues on the journey he was endlessly, tediously banging on about though, preferably far enough never to be seen or heard from again. That "journey" bollocks was far more fishing for sympathy than anything Sam ever said or did.

[sassysocks]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Winning £100k purely because of a sympathy vote is nothing to be proud of.

Sam was a piss poor housemate. Even the Twins or Charlie winning would have been a better result.

To keep calling it a sympathy vote sounds very anti-disability to me. Why does he need sympathy when he has proved he can overcome his hearing problems despite all the negativity coming from some quarters? Clearly many considered him a better option than the likes of Dexter and Gina - live with it.