[MeMyselfAndI]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

We had a long string of 'boring' winners, from around Anthony Hutton right up til Aaron broke the mould on the first c5 show. And we have still had fantastic characters applying, despite knowing that the quiet inoffensive one tends to win. Never before has a boring winner lead to a houseful of boring housemates the next year

Sophie & Josie were not boring, they were both the best housemates in their respective seasons (With John James in BB11)

I can't even at people calling Josie boring, during the show she was talked about constantly, people were fed up of the highlights being about her (Similar to Dexter & Gina haters & their argument, It's not Josie's fault she was the only one doing anything most of the time, afterall there was live feed so there is proof she was the only one bothering.), she was involved in many arguments with Keeva/Sam/many others, she was in a 'showmance' that got a lot of airtime, she was very funny, yes she bitched a bit (why she was hated by lots), and she had lots of fun like food fights with Sam & constantly winding each other up unlike Steve/Mario/Andrew/many other bores. She also did have a very strong personality & a 'great' sense of humour & said many funny things, making the housemates & viewers laugh, i.e. Chimpanzee, and her personality in general. (humour subjective, but you can't deny that she did make an effort/was bubbly & said things people found funny)

Yet because people disliked Josie they say she was a bore, same with Ginxter, It's just so pathetic
I don't call Carol a bore because I dislike her at times.

Josie was a huge part of BB11 & everyone before the finale were saying how a finale of Josie v John James v Sam v Corin would be great as they all contributed so much & were very worthy. Yet magically afterwards change their mind when their fave left. Absolutely pathetic & something I dislike about BB fans, with them being so fickle.