[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

But sometimes it's not just a name, especially if the case has been covered so publicly and the crime was horrid.


Side note: I hope Ian sues for millions. If Kim Kartrashian can sue because someone videotaped a set up a "private" marriage proposal that they're showing on their show anyway, then ian should sue for this.

..it is just a name though, it was Google who have caused distress by using his pic in connection with something/someone quite evil, so that to me is an issue with Google, not an issue with his name...and maybe that's what he'll do...

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..it is just a name though, it was Google who have caused distress by using his pic in connection with something/someone quite evil, so that to me is an issue with Google, not an issue with his name...and maybe that's what he'll do...

ok. but I know that when I see someone named mick philpott i can only think of the crime and wonder how the person owning that name feels.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

ok. but I know that when I see someone named mick philpott i can only think of the crime and wonder how the person owning that name feels.

..having said that, if my surname was Philpott and I had a son, I wouldn't call him Mick, if that was the name I had in mind before the infamous person..but that would be after the fact..I wouldn't change something I already owned....

[Kyle]

If I felt there were enough negative connotations towards it then yes I would.