[King Gizzard]

His past is pretty common knowledge Lol

[jet]

Originally Posted by Nathan

His past is pretty common knowledge Lol

Not to me it wasn't - and I'm not laughing.
If it's that well known then he hasn't a hope of winning.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Nathan

His past is pretty common knowledge Lol

This.

I also try to judge people as housemates by the way they are in the house.

[Z]

Originally Posted by Josy

This.

I also try to judge people as housemates by the way they are in the house.

I try to do that too... think he's a bit of a dick in general but in the house he's been fine so far, which stands him in good stead against everyone else in the house really.

[King Gizzard]

Originally Posted by Josy

This.

I also try to judge people as housemates by the way they are in the house.

yeah, me too, same with when people give crappy nominations that aren't related to the house

[jet]

Originally Posted by Josy

This.

I also try to judge people as housemates by the way they are in the house.

I don't. If they are arseholes outside of it, they are still arseholes no matter how they try to sugarcoat themselves in a 3 week slot.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Nathan

yeah, me too, same with when people give crappy nominations that aren't related to the house

Yeah that annoys me

Originally Posted by jet

I don't. If they are arseholes outside of it, they are still arseholes no matter how they try to sugarcoat themselves in a 3 week slot.

Fair enough, I think everyone is entitled to the benefit of the doubt though, lots of people that feel wronged by celebrities sell stories about them that often tend not to be true, I am in no way saying that about Jim I had heard a lot about him from years ago but I still like to judge housemates on their actual behaviour in the house.

[jet]

Well, Evander was slated for his opinions about homosexuality (rightly so) yet Davidson gets a pass because his documented bigotry against Brian Dowling didn't happen in front of our noses on CBB? I don't get the logic.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Am I watching a different show?
He's a moody old git, sure he's a manic depressive he's either singing and being all animated or moping about grumbling.

I don't think he's moody not from what we have seen anyway, I think Linda tries to provoke him a lot and he does well to walk away from it every time.

Originally Posted by jet

Well, Evander was slated for his opinions about homosexuality (rightly so) yet Davidson gets a pass because his documented bigotry against Brian Dowling didn't happen in front of our noses on CBB? I don't get the logic.

I don't know how you come the conclusion he gets a pass? I'm only posting my own opinion of him in the house nothing else.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Josy

This.

I also try to judge people as housemates by the way they are in the house.

.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Josy

This.

I also try to judge people as housemates by the way they are in the house.

Couldn't agree more. People change and move on, maybe now he's off the booze he is a different person. It happens...

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by Josy

This.

I also try to judge people as housemates by the way they are in the house.

But Jim told Luisa he was a male chauvinist and was keeping his mouth shut and behaving in the house.

He's just bull****ting viewers so I judge him on his behaviour outside seeing as he told Luisa he purposely wasn't being himself, something needs to happen to make his true colours come out as we have only seen glimpses of it.

If he's not going to play the game and show who he really is then its a waste of Channel 5's fee to be honest.

[erinp5]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

But Jim told Luisa he was a male chauvinist and was keeping his mouth shut and behaving in the house.

He's just bull****ting viewers so I judge him on his behaviour outside seeing as he told Luisa he purposely wasn't being himself, something needs to happen to make his true colours come out as we have only seen glimpses of it.

If he's not going to play the game and show who he really is then its a waste of Channel 5's fee to be honest.

That's what I feel about Jim .He has not demonstrated he is a changed man ,he is just performing in the house .

[letmein]

Originally Posted by erinp5

That's what I feel about Jim .He has not demonstrated he is a changed man ,he is just performing in the house .

Of course! Keep in mind the reason he went on the show to begin with.

[Videostar]

Originally Posted by letmein

Of course! Keep in mind the reason he went on the show to begin with.

They are all on the show to either improve or boost their images in one way or another.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by erinp5

That's what I feel about Jim .He has not demonstrated he is a changed man ,he is just performing in the house .

..tbh, I don’t know if he’s ‘performing’ or not..if he hadn’t changed then it would certainly be too damaging for him to show that and I’m sure he’s hoping to improve his public image but that doesn't mean to say that it is a 'performance' ..I’m not really waiting for him to ‘lose it’ either because that would also be an extreme that I don’t think he would do...unlike the normal BB, I think that all of us have preconceived opinions of celebrity housemates and especially the more controversial ones ...and if those opinions are negative then we only change them through their behaviour in the house...and so far, I haven’t seen anything of Jim’s behaviour that would change my opinion, which is a judgement of his time in the house because it’s a judgement that there is nothing I can see that I could support as a housemate...