Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth
thats a total contradiction. you say its wrong to label someone without evidence. they provided no evidence of him being a sexist pig. therefore by your own definition , it is wrong of them to have labelled him a sexist pig. do you agree yes or no? if not why not? because if you say yes its fine then it makes a total mockery of your very own belief.
|
I categorically agree that its wrong to label anyone with no evidence to back up those accusations which ive already said.
A contradiction is a combination of statements, ideas, or features which are opposed to one another I am not opposed to anything.
Im talking about the events in the house and the outside world, Anyone who calls someone a homophobe, hetrophobe or sexist with no proof of those allegations is a bigot or very ignorant.
I don't see why you are getting all worked up just because I wont specifically single out Jims situation, When I say everyone I mean accusations against Jim aswell as other housemates, people in general and the rest of the world.
I was agreeing with your post and for some reason you are picking holes in my comment which is not contradicted or biased.
Can someone please back me up here lol.
Threaded Mode