Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14-02-2014, 10:48 AM #1
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Human meat is actually toxic to humans. Though perhaps that's only in the western world. Apparently, all of the additives and crap we eat and drink, and the general toxins in our everydays lives, make us unfit for human consumption. Quite worrying in itself, really.
user104658 is offline  
Old 14-02-2014, 10:52 AM #2
lostalex's Avatar
lostalex lostalex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029


lostalex lostalex is offline
Senior Member
lostalex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Human meat is actually toxic to humans. Though perhaps that's only in the western world. Apparently, all of the additives and crap we eat and drink, and the general toxins in our everydays lives, make us unfit for human consumption. Quite worrying in itself, really.
i'm pretty sure that consumption of human meat is much more common in the 3rd world than it is in the western world, so i don't think that's the problem. I think it's like mad cow disease, which came about from feeding cow meat to cows. It's an evolutionary mechanism built in to our genes that makes sure that cannibalism is not rewarded in our genes pools. Evolution rewards us for expanding our gene pools, and protect our own gene pools, so eating our own kind would not be beneficial genetically. Evolution does not want us to be eating our young during a hard winter, because those young, if they survive, are our best hope for carrying on our genes to the next generation.
__________________
Don't be afraid to be weak.

Last edited by lostalex; 14-02-2014 at 10:55 AM.
lostalex is offline  
Old 14-02-2014, 11:31 AM #3
Nedusa's Avatar
Nedusa Nedusa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,347

Favourites (more):
CBB 10: Julian Clary
BB13: Luke A
Nedusa Nedusa is offline
Senior Member
Nedusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4,347

Favourites (more):
CBB 10: Julian Clary
BB13: Luke A
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex View Post
i'm pretty sure that consumption of human meat is much more common in the 3rd world than it is in the western world, so i don't think that's the problem. I think it's like mad cow disease, which came about from feeding cow meat to cows. It's an evolutionary mechanism built in to our genes that makes sure that cannibalism is not rewarded in our genes pools. Evolution rewards us for expanding our gene pools, and protect our own gene pools, so eating our own kind would not be beneficial genetically. Evolution does not want us to be eating our young during a hard winter, because those young, if they survive, are our best hope for carrying on our genes to the next generation.
Would certainly go a long way in explaining the problem that is........Africa !!!
__________________
Nedusa is offline  
Old 14-02-2014, 02:48 PM #4
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex View Post
i'm pretty sure that consumption of human meat is much more common in the 3rd world than it is in the western world, so i don't think that's the problem. I think it's like mad cow disease, which came about from feeding cow meat to cows. It's an evolutionary mechanism built in to our genes that makes sure that cannibalism is not rewarded in our genes pools. Evolution rewards us for expanding our gene pools, and protect our own gene pools, so eating our own kind would not be beneficial genetically. Evolution does not want us to be eating our young during a hard winter, because those young, if they survive, are our best hope for carrying on our genes to the next generation.
Maybe so, although cannibalism of those who aren't family members would be evolutionarily advantageous to an extent, especially if they were riddled with regressive traits. An instinct for "Survival of the species" is a total myth, all we're programmed for us survival of our own genetic line, mainly direct decendants although siblings and to a lesser extent full cousins. We should be eating everyone else really. Unless they have some nice genetically diverse traits we'd like to incorporate.

Interestingly, matricidal cannibalism is quite common in the animal kingdom. Rodents especially are big on eating their babies. Ever tried to breed hamsters? You have to get those little suckers out of the cage quickly, or they'll start disappearing! Lots of other species have a habit of killing and eating their "runt" sibling, too.
user104658 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
flesh’, found, heads’, human, restaurant, ‘serving, ‘severed


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts