Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-04-2014, 09:32 PM #30
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

It will make very little difference, much like the covers in shops. If there's an adult left in the country who isn't yet aware that "smoking kills", then smoking is the least of their worries. They shouldn't be out on their own in public, as there's a very high chance that they'll simply wander into traffic... or possibly attempt to eat their own hands.

Unconcerned about the tax on them though. I say double the tax on both and lessen the tax burden elsewhere, or simply use it to reduce the deficit. You could definitely double the tax on alcohol and people would still drink just as much.

There's no reasonable or moral argument for NOT doing so, either. Getting pissed and filling your lungs with smoke is not a basic human right.
user104658 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
3rd, branding, cigarettes, lucky, stripped, time


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts