[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

But if Danielle was cheated, then Marlon was too?

Yes he was,the only difference being that he was the most nominated housemate by all the original housemates.
Whereas Danielle was out from only the choice of 2 of the new housemates after they had been there for only 4 days.

I agree however Marlon's eviction was not,morally, really a legitimate one either.

[Marsh.]

Morally?

[joeysteele]

UOTE=Marsh.;7084554]Morally? [/QUOTE]

Yes Marsh, my morals would be to have fair evictions,so 'I' think it was immoral to evict 2 housemates the way they were.
Please don't start again with your nit picking as to English whatever, I have my morals and one of those morals is to be fair.
Those 2 evictions were not fair in my view,so to me they were 'morally' wrong.
Simple as that.

[Jay.]

I never really vote but I would want either Danielle or Matthew to go back in.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

UOTE=Marsh.;7084554]Morally?

Yes Marsh, my morals would be to have fair evictions,so 'I' think it was immoral to evict 2 housemates the way they were.
Please don't start again with your nit picking as to English whatever, I have my morals and one of those morals is to be fair.
Those 2 evictions were not fair in my view,so to me they were 'morally' wrong.
Simple as that.[/QUOTE]

[mrflibble]

Matthew, he's the only one I miss.

[Livia]

I'm with MrF... Matthew. I don't think we saw the best of him.

[coffee]

Matthew, Toya or Danielle!

[sampvt]

luke marsden, lol. he would sort them out.

[Calderyon]

Jale, Bianca or Danielle. Maybe Matthew.

An absolute NO to Toya, Pauline and Tamara.

[CaudleHalbard]

Danielle is the only one with any moral right to go back in. But I don't actually want any evicted housemates back in.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by sampvt

luke marsden, lol. he would sort them out.

2nd best hm8 EVER

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Danielle is the only one with any moral right to go back in. But I don't actually want any evicted housemates back in.

Marlon was evicted without a public vote too.

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by Achilles

Marlon was evicted without a public vote too.

Yes but he was the choice of the housemates as a whole - a bit of BBUSA.

Danielle was chosen by housemates-in-waiting and only because Kimberly had sloped off.

[sampvt]

Brian Dowling to show mark how to mince and talk like a man not a poodle on crack.

[CaudleHalbard]

Whatever happened to multiple BB winner Mr Dowling. It's as if he never existed.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Whatever happened to multiple BB winner Mr Dowling. It's as if he never existed.

Tyre kicker at Ryan air.

[BigSister]

Matt or Danielle. if Bianca went back in I would stop watching

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Brian Dowling to show mark how to mince and talk like a man not a poodle on crack.

BEST HM8 EVER !!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

UOTE=Marsh.;7084554]Morally?

Yes Marsh, my morals would be to have fair evictions,so 'I' think it was immoral to evict 2 housemates the way they were.
Please don't start again with your nit picking as to English whatever, I have my morals and one of those morals is to be fair.
Those 2 evictions were not fair in my view,so to me they were 'morally' wrong.
Simple as that.[/QUOTE]

I simply asked you a question. You could have simply answered it without getting personal... again.

Don't respond to me as though I'm retarded, I am allowed to question your opinion, and no need to embolden words that I can read.

[Raph]

What about Kimberly?

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by Raph

What about Kimberly?

Wild horses couldn't drag Kimberly back on!

[Futaba]

Toya.

[reece(:]

i'd have all of them back except Tamara.

Pauline most tho

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yes Marsh, my morals would be to have fair evictions,so 'I' think it was immoral to evict 2 housemates the way they were.
Please don't start again with your nit picking as to English whatever, I have my morals and one of those morals is to be fair.
Those 2 evictions were not fair in my view,so to me they were 'morally' wrong.
Simple as that.

I simply asked you a question. You could have simply answered it without getting personal... again.

Don't respond to me as though I'm retarded, I am allowed to question your opinion, and no need to embolden words that I can read.[/QUOTE]



With respect you didn't ask a question, to ask a question would have been to say, what did I mean by morally?
Not just say 'morally' as if it shouldn't be that,or it seeming out of place.

I put words in bold to stress I am only expressing my view,therefore in no way insinuating that someone cannot read them but to highlight the point that they are 'my views' only,no one elses.
I never have ever attempted to speak for someone else,neither have I ever on here or anywhere else for that matter,indicated anyone is retarded, I also never pull people on what they post or how they may type it either.

With respect,after the other day with you when actually you were far more personal against me, I think you now show a fine sense of sensitivity in that you can say and attempt to belittle others but they must, it seems to me, make no comeback to you.

I answered your response to my original post in the fullest and nicest way with the utmost respect for your opinion too, you then came back at me with the word 'morally' used as a single word post.
Frankly I am not bothered why you did that but please don't act like you know me and insinuate that I consider anyone retarded or unable to read.

Nowhere in any of my posts ever on here since joining in 2010 has that been the case and it most certainly was not done in my answer to you on this thread either.
If you wish to argue with someone I would prefer you move on to someone else.