[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

No, this is exactly what the professor means. by stating that there is varying degrees of violence attached to rape that is not an endorsement of rape in any degree.

except that it is, because it's basically excusing some types of rape as "not that bad" Think of how much worse it would be! Some rape victims weren't raped THAT BADLY!

he doesn't get that his words are basically saying, sometimes rape "isn't THAT bad". maybe we shouldn't use the word rape, cause sometimes guys just ****ed a girl against her will, but he didn't beat the hell out of her, or stab her, so its not THAT bad.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by lostalex

except that it is, because it's basically excusing some types of rape as "not that bad" Think of how much worse it would be! Some rape victims weren't raped THAT BADLY!

he doesn't get that his words are basically saying, sometimes rape "isn't THAT bad".

It's still bad... that's never been in dispute.
Dr micheal Stone devised a scale of evil for psychopaths from 1-22, if it is possible to 'rank' them why not rapists and peadophiles?

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It's still bad... that's never been in dispute.
Dr micheal Stone devised a scale of evil for psychopaths from 1-22, if it is possible to 'rank' them why not rapists and peadophiles?

the point is everyone is an individual, and were victimized as individuals. who the **** is richard dawkins to judge how bad a rape is? or tell anyone how much of a victim they are?

I'm an athiest, but Richard Dawkins doesn't speak for me.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by lostalex

the point is everyone is an individual, and were victimized as individuals. who the **** is richard dawkins to judge how bad a rape is? or tell anyone how much of a victim they are?

I'm an athiest, but Richard Dawkins doesn't speak for me.

who are you to judge? who is anyone?