[Josy]

I don't see it that way at all Jords, Chris was fully exposed as a liar and Christopher's entire argument was based on a lie also because Chris was never sharing the cash with all of the housemates.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Josy

I don't see it that way at all Jords, Chris was fully exposed as a liar and Christopher's entire argument was based on a lie also because Chris was never sharing the cash with all of the housemates.

all housemates wont share it either
its big brother

ash would give it to helen,mark,winston
helen would do the same

so on

[jscoo47]

Originally Posted by LukeB

all housemates wont share it either
its big brother

ash would give it to helen,mark,winston
helen would do the same

so on

You are quite right. Other people have seemed to miss the point. Chris said yesterday that things would kick when money was involved. He said to BB that saying no would be boring. He wanted to flush out their greed and he did

[Jords]

Originally Posted by Josy

I don't see it that way at all Jords, Chris was fully exposed as a liar and Christopher's entire argument was based on a lie also because Chris was never sharing the cash with all of the housemates.

Dont buy it. Complete double standards when Mark and Ash also picked to take the money. If it was Chris alone Id understand the viewpoint if still not agree but otherwise nah.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Jords

Dont buy it. Complete double standards when Mark and Ash also picked to take the money. If it was Chris alone Id understand the viewpoint if still not agree but otherwise nah.

Oh I know they both said they would take they money but they never said that they would take it and only share with two other housemates, they also never tried to come up with excuses afterward to make themselves look as if they just wanted it all to end and were doing it for the good of the housemates.

[Jords]

Originally Posted by Josy

Oh I know they both said they would take they money but they never said that they would take it and only share with two other housemates, they also never tried to come up with excuses afterward to make themselves look as if they just wanted it all to end and were doing it for the good of the housemates.

Nope instead they kept quiet and let Chris take all the stick for making the exact same decision to take the money as them :thumbs;

Mark only started up on the attack on Chris when he knew the general consensus was that 'CHRIS IS A BAD GUY FOR MAKING A BAD DECISION WITH BAD INTENTIONS LETS GOB OFF'.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Jords

Nope instead they kept quiet and let Chris take all the stick for making the exact same decision to take the money as them :thumbs;

Mark only started up on the attack on Chris when he knew the general consensus was that 'CHRIS IS A BAD GUY FOR MAKING A BAD DECISION WITH BAD INTENTIONS LETS GOB OFF'.

They never made the exact same decision though Jords surely you can see the difference?

Forget about who would actually share with who for a moment because we have no idea what would happen but going on the words that came from their own mouths in the DR you don't think what Chris decided to do was worse than the other two?

[Jords]

Originally Posted by Josy

They never made the exact same decision though Jords surely you can see the difference?

Forget about who would actually share with who for a moment because we have no idea what would happen but going on the words that came from their own mouths in the DR you don't think what Chris decided to do was worse than the other two?

A good judge of character doesnt just go on the exact words that come out of peoples' mouths. Me and my dad were actually in agreement that we'd take the money and split it only with the HMs we had befriended or were 'nice enough'. And if we won wed do the same with that money set aside. So actually I fully agree with Chris and he has a right to make that decision.

Do I think all the other HMs would share equally that money? No. And Im not gonna have an opinion based just on the words that directly leave their mouth over it. Do I understand why they got mad? Of course. But how they presented themselves once again was as nasty individuals whom pick and choose who they have a problem with and are completely ignorant and unaware.

[RodHull]

Originally Posted by Jords

A good judge of character doesnt just go on the exact words that come out of peoples' mouths. Me and my dad were actually in agreement that we'd take the money and split it only with the HMs we had befriended or were 'nice enough'. And if we won wed do the same with that money set aside. So actually I fully agree with Chris and he has a right to make that decision.

Do I think all the other HMs would share equally that money? No. And Im not gonna have an opinion based just on the words that directly leave their mouth over it. Do I understand why they got mad? Of course. But how they presented themselves once again was as nasty individuals whom pick and choose who they have a problem with and are completely ignorant and unaware.

So forgetting that your basing your decision on your beliefs rather than face value of what they said. Your choosing to disbelieve the others would share but believing Chris would?? WHY exactly??

Also Im not gonna lie Id have taken it if offered but Id have owned my decision and admitted to it, not lied like a snivelling little coward then watch as an argument kicks off then pretend to be all high and mighty about it.

Chris is a bellend.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Jords

A good judge of character doesnt just go on the exact words that come out of peoples' mouths. Me and my dad were actually in agreement that we'd take the money and split it only with the HMs we had befriended or were 'nice enough'. And if we won wed do the same with that money set aside. So actually I fully agree with Chris and he has a right to make that decision.

Do I think all the other HMs would share equally that money? No. And Im not gonna have an opinion based just on the words that directly leave their mouth over it. Do I understand why they got mad? Of course. But how they presented themselves once again was as nasty individuals whom pick and choose who they have a problem with and are completely ignorant and unaware.

What other way can we judge them if not from what they say and do on the highlights?

I guess we will have to agree to disagree because I don't think the same way as you in regards to any of it and I have been a fan of Chris all along but tonight turned me off him in regards to how sneaky he was and how he lied about his intentions and was willing to sit back and watch Christopher take **** for defending him when all the while we knew and he knew he had already said he wouldn't be sharing the money with all of the housemates.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Jords

A good judge of character doesnt just go on the exact words that come out of peoples' mouths. Me and my dad were actually in agreement that we'd take the money and split it only with the HMs we had befriended or were 'nice enough'. And if we won wed do the same with that money set aside. So actually I fully agree with Chris and he has a right to make that decision.

Do I think all the other HMs would share equally that money? No. And Im not gonna have an opinion based just on the words that directly leave their mouth over it. Do I understand why they got mad? Of course. But how they presented themselves once again was as nasty individuals whom pick and choose who they have a problem with and are completely ignorant and unaware.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Josy

I don't see it that way at all Jords, Chris was fully exposed as a liar and Christopher's entire argument was based on a lie also because Chris was never sharing the cash with all of the housemates.

[MrWong]

They have turned it around, I agree.

Pav and Mark will go.

Especially if BB open the phone lines after saving Winston.

A few clips of Pav agreeing with Helen's group should seal his fate.

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by Josy

I don't see it that way at all Jords, Chris was fully exposed as a liar and Christopher's entire argument was based on a lie also because Chris was never sharing the cash with all of the housemates.

Helen, Ash, Winston and Mark would never share that money either. Any money they won was for the winner. The winner would then have the right to do whatever they wanted to with it. Any pacts in a game show are completely irrelevant. It's not a courtroom.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Achilles

Helen, Ash, Winston and Mark would never share that money either. Any money they won was for the winner. The winner would then have the right to do whatever they wanted to with it. Any pacts in a game show are completely irrelevant. It's not a courtroom.

I don't care who would share the money, there is no money for them to share anyway.

I'm discussing what Chris said in the DR and I think that makes him sneaky, a liar and two faced.