[Jords]

Originally Posted by RodHull

Again your basing that on YOUR opinion not the evidence available. Ash at no point has hinted he wouldnt share the money equally your just deciding that to justify your defense of Chris.

Mark is not defendable, hes as bad as Chris. But Ash never once said he was tempted to keep it or he wouldnt give certain people money. Hes guilty of lacking the trust to believe others would split it equally thats it. If you choose to believe (contrary to all evidence) that hes lying then fine. But know that it is indeed contrary to all evidence.

Where as Chris had about 3 or 4 versions of why he made the decision to take the money. At first he never mentioned the others at all and said he was doing it to prove a point.

Your blind to his lies purely cause Helen argued with him, he was caught out as a manipulative liar and then tried to grandstand in the DR at the end to the public (funny that after being told we all loved his DR rants by his friend yesterday)

pet peeve on the forum - when people hark for evidence

I could be wrong. But you could also be wrong and you based your opinion completely on what is said only.

I look beyond that. Its all about trying to understand the HMs different personalities and the situations BB creates. EVERYBODY in that house would have had the thought of keeping the money all themselves because thats a thought process the situation would create (cost-benefit analysis whether to split or not).

tbh I would say there is probably a good chance Chris would have shared the money with everybody anyway purely because of the pressure theyd all give him (especially Helen) after the show and hes the type of guy who looks for an 'easy life' from what Ive observed.