Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-09-2014, 09:56 AM #51
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
Default


[Arrested: Brett and Naghmeh King (pictured being pushed into a police car outside Velez Malaga police station)
will appear before a Madrid court today, accused of neglecting their dying five-year-old son Ashya]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3C3Yckb7w


I hope the Spanish Judge lets them go.

Last edited by arista; 01-09-2014 at 09:56 AM.
arista is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 11:15 AM #52
Angelika Angelika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 761
Angelika Angelika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
There was obviously a good reason why the doctors at Southampton believed it should not be used and considered the child protection order when the father kept insisting.

Those doctors know more about cancer treatment of children than these criminally irresponsible parents, or you and I.

We need to trust the judgement of proper experts.
Patients and parents of patients don't have to blindly accept the judgement of one medical practitioner - the medical practitioner is obliged to refer a patient for a second opinion when requested. It's not up to the doctor to decide his opinion is the only opinion worthy of notice.

There will be investigations in time and the NHS and staff including doctors will have to account for their actions and the stories given to the police regarding the patient and his his family.
Angelika is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 11:20 AM #53
Z's Avatar
Z Z is offline
Z
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 23,560


Z Z is offline
Z
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 23,560


Default

I feel sorry for the King family. These are the actions of parents who are desperate to get their little boy to treatment that might save his life, no police authority or hospital should be standing in the way of that. It's a disgrace. They have my full sympathy and support and I think some of the views expressed in this thread are extremely cold hearted and wrong.
Z is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 11:22 AM #54
Angelika Angelika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 761
Angelika Angelika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arista View Post

[Arrested: Brett and Naghmeh King (pictured being pushed into a police car outside Velez Malaga police station)
will appear before a Madrid court today, accused of neglecting their dying five-year-old son Ashya]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3C3Yckb7w


I hope the Spanish Judge lets them go.
I sincerely hope someone decides to take the right decisions going forward for this young child now languishing in a foreign hospital without his family. He's probably very distressed and confused at suddenly been abandoned.

For God's Sake, let the parents go, they haven't done anything wrong!

Last edited by Angelika; 01-09-2014 at 11:23 AM.
Angelika is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 12:11 PM #55
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

What on earth are they doing?!...

http://namastepublishing.co.uk/the-s...great-britain/
__________________
Kizzy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 12:18 PM #56
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

God I hope this family sues the living **** of everyone involved in this mess.
Tom4784 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 12:22 PM #57
AnnieK's Avatar
AnnieK AnnieK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 15,672


AnnieK AnnieK is offline
Senior Member
AnnieK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 15,672


Default

What??? They are taking parents away from a terminally ill child.....I have heard everything now....unbelievable. What that child must be going through now....I believe he is unable to communicate himself so he must be distraught.....
__________________
AnnieK is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 03:56 PM #58
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,253


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,253


Default

So which medical school did this father graduate from?

Look at it this way, a child is dying, so the parents want to try the latest thing they have read about in some magazine or off of that bastion of absolute and error free truth, the internet.

The parents then want to remove the child from a hospital where they are getting the best treatment the clinicians have devised to chase after some quack cure that they have half read about off of the internet, or some charlatan snake oil salesman is peddling.

The child is the patient and not the parent.

The doctor needs to protect the child from treatments that are unproven, will not work or even make the condition worse, even if that means protecting the child, from their own parents by use of the law.

Also they will also have in mind, other child patients, and if they allow one set of parents to discharge their child against medical advice to run after a quack treatment, then this will set a dangerous precedent putting more children at risk from well meaning parents wanting to try unproven quack treatments.

Even if the treatment is not in itself quackery and is used in one area, it may not be appropriate for another condition. Listening to the clinician last night on the radio news, proton beam therapy is not the right treatment for this child.

By not following medical advice, these parents are guilty of criminal child neglect, if not child endangerment.
__________________
Cyber Devils Advocate (Retired)


Fame, Riches, Adventure, Glory - A Cyber Warrior craves not these things

In Memorium
Wendy (AKA Romantic Old Bird) 1951 - 2008
Sticks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 03:57 PM #59
Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Default

This is awful!If either of my 2 kids got ill like this and the NHS gave up on them i would do anything i could to save them!They need to look at the parents motives behind this,which are saving their child!Their child is their number 1 priority!How can they be charged with neglect??
Northern Monkey is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 04:01 PM #60
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,253


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,253


Default

Simple, they removed their child from hospital against medical advice
__________________
Cyber Devils Advocate (Retired)


Fame, Riches, Adventure, Glory - A Cyber Warrior craves not these things

In Memorium
Wendy (AKA Romantic Old Bird) 1951 - 2008
Sticks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 04:02 PM #61
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
Simple, they removed their child from hospital against medical advice

Wrong
they had no choice time was running out
arista is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 05:35 PM #62
anne666's Avatar
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
anne666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieK View Post
What??? They are taking parents away from a terminally ill child.....I have heard everything now....unbelievable. What that child must be going through now....I believe he is unable to communicate himself so he must be distraught.....
It's shocking to do such a thing. His brother was hoping to see him this afternoon.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29009883


Quote:
The Proton Therapy Centre (PTC) in Prague, Czech Republic, which received a request from Brett King on 20 August, said it can treat Ashya immediately if he is eligible.

Iva Tatounova, director of strategy at PTC Czech, said: "The centre is keen on starting the treatment in a few days. The costs would be dealt with later on."

She said the centre would need the necessary medical documentation before they could agree on the appropriateness of treatment, which usually costs Ł60,000 - Ł65,000 for children.
The law has to let this drop FGS and let them take him immediately.
__________________
anne666 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 06:07 PM #63
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,253


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,253


Default

Portsmouth Council are making the child a ward of court, so luckily he will be back in the UK ASAP and that will be the end of this nonsense about proton beam therapy. A clinician has already said it is not the appropriate treatment for this child.
__________________
Cyber Devils Advocate (Retired)


Fame, Riches, Adventure, Glory - A Cyber Warrior craves not these things

In Memorium
Wendy (AKA Romantic Old Bird) 1951 - 2008
Sticks is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 06:09 PM #64
dojo88 dojo88 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 44

Favourites:
CBB15: Katie Hopkins
CBB14: Gary
dojo88 dojo88 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 44

Favourites:
CBB15: Katie Hopkins
CBB14: Gary
Default

The blooming NHS should be held by the police, the NHS are KILLERS!!!!

NHS=Neglectful Human Slaughterers

Hopefully his parents will try for another baby so that they can live a happy life after he eventually passes away.

Last edited by dojo88; 01-09-2014 at 06:17 PM.
dojo88 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 07:24 PM #65
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
So which medical school did this father graduate from?

Look at it this way, a child is dying, so the parents want to try the latest thing they have read about in some magazine or off of that bastion of absolute and error free truth, the internet.

The parents then want to remove the child from a hospital where they are getting the best treatment the clinicians have devised to chase after some quack cure that they have half read about off of the internet, or some charlatan snake oil salesman is peddling.

The child is the patient and not the parent.

The doctor needs to protect the child from treatments that are unproven, will not work or even make the condition worse, even if that means protecting the child, from their own parents by use of the law.

Also they will also have in mind, other child patients, and if they allow one set of parents to discharge their child against medical advice to run after a quack treatment, then this will set a dangerous precedent putting more children at risk from well meaning parents wanting to try unproven quack treatments.

Even if the treatment is not in itself quackery and is used in one area, it may not be appropriate for another condition. Listening to the clinician last night on the radio news, proton beam therapy is not the right treatment for this child.

By not following medical advice, these parents are guilty of criminal child neglect, if not child endangerment.
Blind conformity to the nanny state, succinctly defined in one post.
user104658 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 07:28 PM #66
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

They had the right to request a second opinion, it's their money if they wanted to try the therapy then that should be their right.
It's basically the same thing as was being offered in the UK, radiation therapy.. except proton beams don't penetrate through tumours.
__________________
Kizzy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 07:31 PM #67
anne666's Avatar
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
anne666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
Portsmouth Council are making the child a ward of court, so luckily he will be back in the UK ASAP and that will be the end of this nonsense about proton beam therapy. A clinician has already said it is not the appropriate treatment for this child.
How dare they!!! That bloody hospital has a lot to answer for here and I hope they are held to account. Since when has it become a crime or immoral for parents to seek out treatment they HOPE may benefit their own child? As for "a Clinician has said", he is not to be questioned? Since when and who is he, God? Try putting yourself in the parent's shoes. They refuse to give up hope and good for them. We aren't all nannied into submission, thank goodness.
__________________

Last edited by anne666; 01-09-2014 at 07:40 PM.
anne666 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 07:38 PM #68
AnnieK's Avatar
AnnieK AnnieK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 15,672


AnnieK AnnieK is offline
Senior Member
AnnieK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 15,672


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
Portsmouth Council are making the child a ward of court, so luckily he will be back in the UK ASAP and that will be the end of this nonsense about proton beam therapy. A clinician has already said it is not the appropriate treatment for this child.
And I suppose you think it's right also for the child to be kept separate from his parents during whatever time he has left. A child who has known love from his parents and family now faces the prospect of losing his battle for life and the last faces he is yo see are faceless doctors or court appointed social workers. That, to me, is child cruelty. I also assume you have never heard of medical professionals getting things wrong or covering their arses? They are not infallible just because they have a medical degree....
__________________
AnnieK is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 07:45 PM #69
anne666's Avatar
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
anne666 anne666 is offline
Senior Member
anne666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 1,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnnieK View Post
And I suppose you think it's right also for the child to be kept separate from his parents during whatever time he has left. A child who has known love from his parents and family now faces the prospect of losing his battle for life and the last faces he is yo see are faceless doctors or court appointed social workers. That, to me, is child cruelty. I also assume you have never heard of medical professionals getting things wrong or covering their arses? They are not infallible just because they have a medical degree....
I agree with that too! This is a catalogue of the most strange behaviour, all stemming from that hospital! What is their agenda? They were only yelling about the fact that the batteries would have run out on his feeder, well they were wrong. What else is going on here? That poor child needs his parents by his side as much as is humanly possible. His brother was trying to visit him today? Does anyone know if he succeeded?
__________________
anne666 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 08:05 PM #70
Ammi's Avatar
Ammi Ammi is offline
Quand il pleut, il pleut
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 76,164


Ammi Ammi is offline
Quand il pleut, il pleut
Ammi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 76,164


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
Portsmouth Council are making the child a ward of court, so luckily he will be back in the UK ASAP and that will be the end of this nonsense about proton beam therapy. A clinician has already said it is not the appropriate treatment for this child.

..maybe Sticks, that’s been said because it can’t be offered to him whereas it is available and has some proven success in other countries..?...it is in effect the same treatment that he’s having but directing the radiation more to the tumlour so there are far lower chances of permanent significant brain damage through damage to the surrounding cells and a chance for a far greater life quality...and it’s especially effective in children with brain tumours..it is a recognised treatment by Cancer Research who already send patients overseas for the treatment and it will be offered in the UK from 2018..but the machines are expensive and bulky according to Dr Hilary on This Morning who also said...’ it is very effective. It is similar to conventional radiotherapy, except for the fact that you get less scatter.
"The proton beams are positively charged particles. They are focus on the tumour and cause less collateral damage to structures around the tumour, so the complication rate is less.
‘’So in effect it could be more cost effective."




..maybe this is something that his own surgeons or doctors don’t agree is necessary because the treatment is so similar to what they would themselves give him but without transporting him or the expense of it etc....but that doesn’t mean it’s not going to make a huge difference in his future quality of life and there is no one who loves him more, no one who places such importance on that quality of his life, no one who would have his interests at heart more and no one who will be thinking of his future life more than his parents and I think they've showed that...if his parents are allowed to take him for the treatment, if they can raise the money quickly enough then there doesn’t seem to be anything to ‘lose’ at all with this but possibly everything to ‘gain’ for Ashya..who is the only person they’re thinking about..and they’re not thinking about whether it’s available here under the NHS but just that this could make all the difference to him and they love him enough to want to try that and they love him enough to want life quality for him..to increase the chances of that....which parent wouldn’t..

Last edited by Ammi; 01-09-2014 at 08:05 PM.
Ammi is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:27 PM #71
Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Northern Monkey Northern Monkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
BB18: Tom


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi View Post
..maybe Sticks, that’s been said because it can’t be offered to him whereas it is available and has some proven success in other countries..?...it is in effect the same treatment that he’s having but directing the radiation more to the tumlour so there are far lower chances of permanent significant brain damage through damage to the surrounding cells and a chance for a far greater life quality...and it’s especially effective in children with brain tumours..it is a recognised treatment by Cancer Research who already send patients overseas for the treatment and it will be offered in the UK from 2018..but the machines are expensive and bulky according to Dr Hilary on This Morning who also said...’ it is very effective. It is similar to conventional radiotherapy, except for the fact that you get less scatter.
"The proton beams are positively charged particles. They are focus on the tumour and cause less collateral damage to structures around the tumour, so the complication rate is less.
‘’So in effect it could be more cost effective."




..maybe this is something that his own surgeons or doctors don’t agree is necessary because the treatment is so similar to what they would themselves give him but without transporting him or the expense of it etc....but that doesn’t mean it’s not going to make a huge difference in his future quality of life and there is no one who loves him more, no one who places such importance on that quality of his life, no one who would have his interests at heart more and no one who will be thinking of his future life more than his parents and I think they've showed that...if his parents are allowed to take him for the treatment, if they can raise the money quickly enough then there doesn’t seem to be anything to ‘lose’ at all with this but possibly everything to ‘gain’ for Ashya..who is the only person they’re thinking about..and they’re not thinking about whether it’s available here under the NHS but just that this could make all the difference to him and they love him enough to want to try that and they love him enough to want life quality for him..to increase the chances of that....which parent wouldn’t..
Very well said His parents care for him more than anyone else in the world.They should'nt be punished for trying to save their child.
Northern Monkey is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 01:19 PM #72
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

'The government has contacted police and health officials to see whether Ashya King, the five-year-old cancer patient currently in hospital alone in Spain, can be reunited with his mother and father, as Theresa May told the Commons attempts to extradite the parents to Britain were being reviewed.

The new interventions follow a mounting chorus of voices calling for Brett and Naghmeh King, currently held in separate Spanish prisons after removing their son from a Southampton hospital without doctors' consent to seek alternative treatment abroad for his brain tumour, to be brought to Málaga, where Ashya is being cared for at a children's hospital without his family.'

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2...full-force-law
__________________

Last edited by Kizzy; 02-09-2014 at 01:21 PM.
Kizzy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 01:35 PM #73
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
Default

The PM has just said
he wants the parents with the child.


In Spain they are now letting them go
and the Hospital will allow them to see their son
after hours

Last edited by arista; 02-09-2014 at 03:22 PM.
arista is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 03:49 PM #74
Angelika Angelika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 761
Angelika Angelika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 761
Default

Please sign the Change.org petition to release Aysher's parents immediately and reunite the family.
Angelika is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 04:01 PM #75
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 184,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelika View Post
Please sign the Change.org petition to release Aysher's parents immediately and reunite the family.

But the parents are now getting released
by order of the Judge
arista is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
boy, brain, hospital, tumour


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts