[bots]

Originally Posted by LiamPRW

The difference? he didn't sit there with his trousers around his knees with his front bits hanging out.
Not that i enjoy any sort of below the waist nudity on Tv, but there is a difference.

If you bare your ass, you bear other bits too. It is the same thing, the difference is that:

1. Gary is disliked by the hm's that took offense.
2. Gary had a reason for doing it given it was a medical emergency.

3. George is liked by other hm's so no offense
4. George was doing it for fun

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

If you bare your ass, you bear other bits too. It is the same thing, the difference is that:

1. Gary is disliked by the hm's that took offense.
2. Gary had a reason for doing it given it was a medical emergency.

3. George is liked by other hm's so no offense
4. George was doing it for fun

In a nut shell

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

If you bare your ass, you bear other bits too. It is the same thing, the difference is that:

1. Gary is disliked by the hm's that took offense.
2. Gary had a reason for doing it given it was a medical emergency.

3. George is liked by other hm's so no offense
4. George was doing it for fun

No.. that's not true at all, you can easily pull down the back of your trousers to expose your ass, without pulling the front down too..

[Pincho Paxton]

1/ Dee said...

"I didn't expect to walk into the Kitchen to see Gary's bits."

Which means that she walked into the kitchen.

2/ Gary was in pain, he sat down to fix his knee. Pain relief comes before nakedness.

3/ Dee, and James over-reacted.

[Marsh.]

It's not as if we saw his arse or cock anyway, so airing it was no big deal.