Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13-10-2014, 05:11 PM #1
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 35,070


Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 35,070


Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
Exodus 21:1 “These are the laws you are to set before them:
Hebrew Servants
2 “If you buy a Hebrew servant, he is to serve you for six years. But in the seventh year, he shall go free, without paying anything. 3 If he comes alone, he is to go free alone; but if he has a wife when he comes, she is to go with him. 4 If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the woman and her children shall belong to her master, and only the man shall go free.
5 “But if the servant declares, ‘I love my master and my wife and children and do not want to go free,’ 6 then his master must take him before the judges. He shall take him to the door or the doorpost and pierce his ear with an awl. Then he will be his servant for life.

7 “If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as menservants do. 8 If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself, he must let her be redeemed. He has no right to sell her to foreigners, because he has broken faith with her. 9 If he selects her for his son, he must grant her the rights of a daughter. 10 If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights. 11 If he does not provide her with these three things, she is to go free, without any payment of money.

20 “If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, 21 but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

Lev 25:1 The LORD said to Moses on Mount Sinai…

Lev 25:39 ” ‘If one of your countrymen becomes poor among you and sells himself to you, do not make him work as a slave. 40 He is to be treated as a hired worker or a temporary resident among you; he is to work for you until the Year of Jubilee. 41 Then he and his children are to be released, and he will go back to his own clan and to the property of his forefathers. 42 Because the Israelites are my servants, whom I brought out of Egypt, they must not be sold as slaves. 43 Do not rule over them ruthlessly, but fear your God.

44 ” ‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

47 ” ‘If an alien or a temporary resident among you becomes rich and one of your countrymen becomes poor and sells himself to the alien living among you or to a member of the alien’s clan, 48 he retains the right of redemption after he has sold himself. One of his relatives may redeem him: 49 An uncle or a cousin or any blood relative in his clan may redeem him. Or if he prospers, he may redeem himself. 50 He and his buyer are to count the time from the year he sold himself up to the Year of Jubilee. The price for his release is to be based on the rate paid to a hired man for that number of years. 51 If many years remain, he must pay for his redemption a larger share of the price paid for him. 52 If only a few years remain until the Year of Jubilee, he is to compute that and pay for his redemption accordingly. 53 He is to be treated as a man hired from year to year; you must see to it that his owner does not rule over him ruthlessly.

54 ” ‘Even if he is not redeemed in any of these ways, he and his children are to be released in the Year of Jubilee, 55 for the Israelites belong to me as servants. They are my servants, whom I brought out of Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

The bible permits slavery with direct commandments from God. The rules are somewhat complicated, with differences between Hebrews vs. gentiles and men vs. women. The verses above are not all the rules on slavery, but they are direct quotes from God if you believe the bible to be literal.

For Hebrews, slavery was a way to pay off a debt. After 6 years of work, a Hebrew slave would be set free in the year of Jubilee – as long as the slave is male. A father has the right to sell his daughter into slavery. Exodus 21:7-11 describe rules for selling a daughter as slave, but the verses seem to interchange female slavery and marriage.

Exodus 21:20-21 permit slave owners to beat their slaves so that they are unconscious for 2-3 days!

Leviticus 25:44-45 describes how gentile slaves are to be treated, which is very different from Hebrew slaves. Gentile slaves are not to be set free in the year of Jubillee but are passed from father to son as an inheritance.

There you go guys and girls. You can have slaves if you want. God wills it.

At the risk of repeating myself, because I've said this on another thread when someone was cutting and pasting Leviticus... you have to think about when 613 Mitzvot, or Commandments, were written. It was normal to own slaves back then. It was fine to own slaves up until about 200 years ago in this country! Do we think it's okay now? No we don't. Do we think we should be killed for planting two different grains in one field, or for wearing two different fabrics on our body, or for cutting our hair? No, of course not. You have to interpret the laws - as a lawyer, let me tell you, laws are interpreted every day - and you have to think about what those interpretations mean. You cannot say that you will live to the letter of these laws because it is impossible to live a good, responsible, happy, lawful life if you think that these ancient rules must be taken literally. No one takes the Bible literally unless they are a fool.

it's never good for me to see my faith reduced to a series of incoherent cut and paste jobs with an air of ridicule running through it. I do hope that's not the way this thread will be going.

Last edited by Livia; 13-10-2014 at 05:12 PM.
Livia is offline  
Old 13-10-2014, 07:48 PM #2
Kyle's Avatar
Kyle Kyle is offline
Mr Rocket League
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Posts: 5,151
Kyle Kyle is offline
Mr Rocket League
Kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Posts: 5,151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
At the risk of repeating myself, because I've said this on another thread when someone was cutting and pasting Leviticus... you have to think about when 613 Mitzvot, or Commandments, were written. It was normal to own slaves back then. It was fine to own slaves up until about 200 years ago in this country! Do we think it's okay now? No we don't. Do we think we should be killed for planting two different grains in one field, or for wearing two different fabrics on our body, or for cutting our hair? No, of course not. You have to interpret the laws - as a lawyer, let me tell you, laws are interpreted every day - and you have to think about what those interpretations mean. You cannot say that you will live to the letter of these laws because it is impossible to live a good, responsible, happy, lawful life if you think that these ancient rules must be taken literally. No one takes the Bible literally unless they are a fool.

it's never good for me to see my faith reduced to a series of incoherent cut and paste jobs with an air of ridicule running through it. I do hope that's not the way this thread will be going.
Ah the old moral relativism argument. Well if something is applicable then and not now Then obviously the word of God is subjective and not objective as it's open to change and no longer immutable or perfect. Kinda screws up his omniscience though if he didn't see it coming that in the modern era we live in we frown on slavery. Oh well.

And play the persecution card if ya like. I am thankful I live in a day and age where I can question things like the bible without been noosed up as an infidel.
Kyle is offline  
Old 13-10-2014, 11:59 PM #3
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
At the risk of repeating myself, because I've said this on another thread when someone was cutting and pasting Leviticus... you have to think about when 613 Mitzvot, or Commandments, were written. It was normal to own slaves back then. It was fine to own slaves up until about 200 years ago in this country! Do we think it's okay now? No we don't. Do we think we should be killed for planting two different grains in one field, or for wearing two different fabrics on our body, or for cutting our hair? No, of course not. You have to interpret the laws - as a lawyer, let me tell you, laws are interpreted every day - and you have to think about what those interpretations mean. You cannot say that you will live to the letter of these laws because it is impossible to live a good, responsible, happy, lawful life if you think that these ancient rules must be taken literally. No one takes the Bible literally unless they are a fool.

it's never good for me to see my faith reduced to a series of incoherent cut and paste jobs with an air of ridicule running through it. I do hope that's not the way this thread will be going.

agreed, the cheap shots against Religion are pathetic, so many anti religious haters, or atheists know little or nothing of theology and take bits and pieces of works and tales way out of context to support their agenda. I also agree the tendency to take everything far too literally is frankly moronic. such people need to heavily medicated
the truth is offline  
Old 14-10-2014, 12:08 AM #4
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth View Post
agreed, the cheap shots against Religion are pathetic, so many anti religious haters, or atheists know little or nothing of theology and take bits and pieces of works and tales way out of context to support their agenda. I also agree the tendency to take everything far too literally is frankly moronic. such people need to heavily medicated
Whose gospel is that?!
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 14-10-2014, 12:09 AM #5
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy View Post
Whose gospel is that?!
"The Truth, Post 416, 14 10 14"
Marsh. is offline  
Old 14-10-2014, 12:10 AM #6
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
the truth the truth is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy View Post
Whose gospel is that?!
the gospel of the truth
the truth is offline  
Old 13-10-2014, 07:58 PM #7
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 35,070


Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 35,070


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
Ah the old moral relativism argument. Well if something is applicable then and not now Then obviously the word of God is subjective and not objective as it's open to change and no longer immutable or perfect. Kinda screws up his omniscience though if he didn't see it coming that in the modern era we live in we frown on slavery. Oh well.
After all the years of scholars more intelligent than us, poring over texts and coming up with nothing that will satisfactorily silence those who are only here to scoff, I'm not sure any of us on this thread is going to come up with something that will satisfy everyone. And just because you consider something to be "the old moral relativism argument../." does not mean that it's beneath contempt and dismissible anywhere but in your own head.

You can think what you like about my faith, and I'll think what I like about your interpretation of it. I know what I feel and what I believe. You've only just developed an interest in the Old Testament and yet here you are thinking you have all the answers. To use your own quote... oh well.
Livia is offline  
Old 13-10-2014, 08:19 PM #8
Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Marsh. Marsh. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 79,976


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
After all the years of scholars more intelligent than us, poring over texts and coming up with nothing that will satisfactorily silence those who are only here to scoff, I'm not sure any of us on this thread is going to come up with something that will satisfy everyone. And just because you consider something to be "the old moral relativism argument../." does not mean that it's beneath contempt and dismissible anywhere but in your own head.

You can think what you like about my faith, and I'll think what I like about your interpretation of it. I know what I feel and what I believe. You've only just developed an interest in the Old Testament and yet here you are thinking you have all the answers. To use your own quote... oh well.
Marsh. is offline  
Old 13-10-2014, 08:40 PM #9
Bluerang1 Bluerang1 is offline
yuh yuh
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: US
Posts: 4,781

Favourites (more):
CBB14: Frenchy
BB15: Toya
Bluerang1 Bluerang1 is offline
yuh yuh
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: US
Posts: 4,781

Favourites (more):
CBB14: Frenchy
BB15: Toya
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
After all the years of scholars more intelligent than us, poring over texts and coming up with nothing that will satisfactorily silence those who are only here to scoff, I'm not sure any of us on this thread is going to come up with something that will satisfy everyone. And just because you consider something to be "the old moral relativism argument../." does not mean that it's beneath contempt and dismissible anywhere but in your own head.

You can think what you like about my faith, and I'll think what I like about your interpretation of it. I know what I feel and what I believe. You've only just developed an interest in the Old Testament and yet here you are thinking you have all the answers. To use your own quote... oh well.
Slay a bit
Bluerang1 is offline  
Old 13-10-2014, 11:17 PM #10
Fetch The Bolt Cutters's Avatar
Fetch The Bolt Cutters Fetch The Bolt Cutters is offline
-
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 34,862


Fetch The Bolt Cutters Fetch The Bolt Cutters is offline
-
Fetch The Bolt Cutters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 34,862


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
After all the years of scholars more intelligent than us, poring over texts and coming up with nothing that will satisfactorily silence those who are only here to scoff, I'm not sure any of us on this thread is going to come up with something that will satisfy everyone. And just because you consider something to be "the old moral relativism argument../." does not mean that it's beneath contempt and dismissible anywhere but in your own head.

You can think what you like about my faith, and I'll think what I like about your interpretation of it. I know what I feel and what I believe. You've only just developed an interest in the Old Testament and yet here you are thinking you have all the answers. To use your own quote... oh well.
yaaaaaaaas.gif
Fetch The Bolt Cutters is offline  
Old 13-10-2014, 11:23 PM #11
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
After all the years of scholars more intelligent than us, poring over texts and coming up with nothing that will satisfactorily silence those who are only here to scoff, I'm not sure any of us on this thread is going to come up with something that will satisfy everyone. And just because you consider something to be "the old moral relativism argument../." does not mean that it's beneath contempt and dismissible anywhere but in your own head.

You can think what you like about my faith, and I'll think what I like about your interpretation of it. I know what I feel and what I believe. You've only just developed an interest in the Old Testament and yet here you are thinking you have all the answers. To use your own quote... oh well.
Where has he said he has 'all the answers'? nowhere.

Scholars know as much as you or I as like you and I they were not there.
And the interpretations by the differing faiths mindblowingly complex and contradictory.
It's not about coming up with something, it's appreciating diversity, the meaning of life is never going to be the same for one person as another and smelting it down to who is the most devout is pointless as nobody knows * for certain* what the 'true path' if ever there indeed was one is.
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
life, meaning


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts