[Daniel.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Yes ,she was

It still makes absoloutley no difference

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It's a bit different tbh. Like when Chloe mentioned her page 3 modelling.

Those images are her choice to put in the public arena. Nothing to do with someone helping themselves to opening your clothes.

Spoiler:

Don't spoil it Marsh

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Yes ,she was

There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.

Spoiler:

[Liam-]

Morsh scalping with imagery

[bots]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

But equally there are not many tv programs that are 24/7 in a house where she could easily have been preparing for a shower/bed. Lets not forget that the puking was an unexpected event at a snapshot in time. Its not like Chloe thought ... Jeremy is in the loo puking, I will just get naked under my bathrobe and give him an opportunity to see my bits

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Spoiler:

Don't spoil it Marsh

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.

Spoiler:

On your tv ,but as we've proved ,it not working as good as it should be

[Liam-]

lmfao and then we know that Marsh wins the argument <3

[kirklancaster]

QUOTE=Kazanne;7474950] Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form, Of couse they would [/QUOTE]

Kazanne!!!!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

On your tv ,but as we've proved ,it not working as good as it should be

Oh right, so Chloe was sat down as seen in that image (you did look at it didn't you my love?) on my TV but leaning over him on yours? Ok hun.

Maybe a change in your prescription is required.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by LiamPRW

lmfao and then we know that Marsh wins the argument <3

He wishes

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

He wishes

When it comes to "proved" I am the only one to have provided actual evidence to my points.

Come and join the adults and be rational for once.

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

He wishes

You had to resort to questioning the working state of his tv as an apparently 'rational' argument.. it's fair to say, in a debate where proof is needed, you lost

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 and yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 abd yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying in the nicest way possible that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

That old woman I saw on the ward in hospital had nothing on under the hospital gown.

The little tease.

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 abd yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying in the nicest way possible that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

No you are not wrong, you are very much correct unfortunately

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

That old woman I saw on the ward in hospital had nothing on under the hospital gown.

The little tease.

Not even those sexy little paper knickers?

The filthy mare!

[Pincho Paxton]

They should put Frank Bruno in with his sexy boxer dressing gown he's the complete package!!!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Not even those sexy little paper knickers?

The filthy mare!

She'd pissed herself so had to take it off.

But we know that was all part of her plan.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

When it comes to "proved" I am the only one to have provided actual evidence to my points.

Come and join the adults and be rational for once.

Adults ? I look in the lounge love, I think your highly mistaken

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

She'd pissed herself so had to take it off.

But we know that was all part of her plan.

Pfft how transparent.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Adults ? I look in the lounge love, I think your highly mistaken

You're looking in the lounge? Try the kitchen maybe you left your marbles there?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You're looking in the lounge? Try the kitchen maybe you left your marbles there?

Is this is personal attack by any chance ?

[ChristmasNeeve]

Yes alright you two, lets not start insulting eachother

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Is this is personal attack by any chance ?

Only as personal as the ones sent my way.