[Beso]

Originally Posted by thinkingoutloud

If it's behind her back how could it possibly be considered 'bullying'?

Not all of it was behind her back, a pack turned on one person and carried the whole thing on for days laughing and mocking as they did it.

It showed one bullied person and three to four bullies.

[thinkingoutloud]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Not all of it was behind her back, a pack turned on one person and carried the whole thing on for days laughing and mocking as they did it.

It showed one bullied person and three to four bullies.

So what, they were supposed to just sit there and say nothing when she stole the bananas? Katie and the other girls have had every right to confront her about the issue, the same goes for Katie and the child/diet debate (it was simply a matter of differing opinions) and if you're referring to Katie's newspaper column she wrote last night...well that was part of her 'act'.

Just as many people have targeted or bitched about Perez (we've even seen lots of tears) but I see no complaining about him being 'bullied'. Number one, probably because he's a guy and not seen as 'weak' and number two because he's generally unpopular with the majority of the public. What a load of rubbish.

[ebandit]

alicia's 'performance' was about plastic sugery...........what else could she have chosen?...........stalking/bonking rich men

makes her fair game for being called 'thick'

there is always a little horseplay in the house...........does not make it bullying

Mark L

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by ebandit

alicia's 'performance' was about plastic sugery...........what else could she have chosen?...........stalking/bonking rich men

makes her fair game for being called 'thick'

there is always a little horseplay in the house...........does not make it bullying

Mark L

Why? That makes no sense.

[ebandit]

Originally Posted by Stevep

Why? That makes no sense.

.........because she was unable to offer anything interesting..............or

entertaining

Mark L

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by ebandit

.........because she was unable to offer anything interesting..............or

entertaining

Mark L

No, you stated that because her claim to fame is plastic surgery and 'bonking rich men' she is automatically 'fair game' to be ridiculed as thick. Which again, makes no sense whatsoever. You could be regarded as 'thick' if you are lacking intelligence, but how you make your money is not necessarily indicative of how intelligent you are. Especially in the realm of celebrity where in many cases menial jobs can earn people **** loads.

The only time where 'thick' would be understandable, but not acceptable, would be when a bunch of five year olds are ridiculing each-other. When a 40 something year old woman constantly targets another person, unprovoked, for being 'thick' it's just outright malicious and disrespectful.

If people cannot see that then perhaps they are the ones that are lacking.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by thinkingoutloud

So what, they were supposed to just sit there and say nothing when she stole the bananas? Katie and the other girls have had every right to confront her about the issue, the same goes for Katie and the child/diet debate (it was simply a matter of differing opinions) and if you're referring to Katie's newspaper column she wrote last night...well that was part of her 'act'.

Just as many people have targeted or bitched about Perez (we've even seen lots of tears) but I see no complaining about him being 'bullied'. Number one, probably because he's a guy and not seen as 'weak' and number two because he's generally unpopular with the majority of the public. What a load of rubbish.

two wrongs don't make a right though do they,and was there any reason to carry bananagate into the next night and the following day seeing as she apologised after the event, it should have been left at that.

That's just bananagate though, what about the pointing and sniggering about her being dumb, the name calling of dilbert, or that tattooed hag shouting about her fake ass..it all adds up to someones time in the house being as miserable as sin.