[reality]

On the subject of Perez and who to vote out etc.. I have to say that although that I do find entertaining (for all the wrong reasons), he does NOT deserve a pass to the final as Channel 5 are so blatantly hoping will be the outcome of their online 'poll'. I find it insulting that Channel 5 appear to think so little of their viewers that they assume that we can't see how much they're trying to manipulate everything that they possibly can in order to keep Perez in the show.
Nobody deserves a pass to the final (just look at last year's BB winner Helen - the most hated "winner" in BB hstory) or to be up for eviction every week, the whole point of BB is that the housemates nominate who they least want to stay and the viewers get the CHOICE to vote to save or evict those who are up for eviction. Channel 5 are breaking all of the rules of BB in a desperate attempt to save Perez and keep the nation talking about his ridiculous antics.
And no matter how entertaining he is, let's not forget that he was instrumental in Alexander's exit because of his disgusting goading behaviour, and (to a certain extent) he also managed to whip up enough PC controversy so that Big Brother had no choice to remove Jeremy and Ken from the house.
This kind of behaviour should not be rewarded with immunity, but I fear that's what the outcome of the poll will be, due to the massive bias of Perez-centred coverage by Channel 5. They say that the viewers get to "choose" whether Perez gets immunity or goes up for eviction each week, but why are they offering us this "choice" only for Perez? Why not any of the other housemates? Although he is frustratingly entertaining to watch, it is not fair that this option is available for only Perez.
We should be able to "choose" who we want to save out of the FAIRLY nominated housemates, no exceptions.
Sorry to rant, but the fact that Channel 5 are so blatantly insulting the intelligence of their viewers in order to boost ratings and media coverage is just wrong.