[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

She has and will continue to pay more tax then me, you or any other average working person in the UK so there for she should be allowed to take back out to help care for her son

Never said she wasnt allowed, I just take a dim view on people who take help when its not needed when others who do need the help are screwed over

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Never said she wasnt allowed, I just take a dim view on people who take help when its not needed when others who do need the help are screwed over

I see it as a choice of helping a disabled child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I see it as a choice of helping a disabked child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work

Really, you think those are the only options?! What about the other disabled kids who are having to move house due to the bedroom tax (and disabled people are NOT excluded as the government claims btw). About disabled adults/kids who are losing their dla entitlements because of cuts also...etc.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Really, you think those are the only options?! What about the other disabled kids who are having to move house due to the bedroom tax (and disabled people are NOT excluded as the government claims btw). About disabled adults/kids who are losing their dla entitlements because of cuts also...etc.

Your missing the point in that id rather it go to someone who needs it then someone who dont need it they just abuse it

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

Your missing the point in that id rather it go to someone who needs it then someone who dont need it they just abuse it

And you are missing the point that I am making too tbh. Possibly as you are getting slightly hysterical at what you see as me putting katie price down. Which is not what I am doing at all. I dont doubt that she is entitled to help. I simply disagree with someone with her wealth getting it for something such as a taxi to school tbh...whilst others with nothing are having all of their help removed under the guise of 'cuts'. Shes not wrong for taking what offered, however they system is wrong to allow it in the first place. IMO of course.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

And you are missing the point that I am making too tbh. Possibly as you are getting slightly hysterical at what you see as me putting katie price down. Which is not what I am doing at all. I dont doubt that she is entitled to help. I simply disagree with someone with her wealth getting it for something such as a taxi to school tbh...whilst others with nothing are having all of their help removed under the guise of 'cuts'. Shes not wrong for taking what offered, however they system is wrong to allow it in the first place. IMO of course.

This.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I see it as a choice of helping a disabked child or funding a drug addicts addiction or sombody who cant be arsed to work

Or indeed another tit job or plastic surgery,imo IF you can afford it pay for stuff yourself and let some other poor unfortunate benefit from your tax money,as tbf we don't seem to mind paying for the likes oh White dee types.