[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

How am I mocking you? Because I post a 'Laugh' or 'Joker' emoticon when someone cracks a funny? You really need to relax Kizzy and to examine your own conduct. I can reproduce many posts from different threads when you have acted far worse against me than this which you are taking umbrage at now - including posting highly offensive pictures of the Virgin Mary and making other mocking comments about my Christianity just because I held opposite views to you and three or four others.

I am not mocking you nor denouncing your right to hold opposite views.

I quoted nedusa not you if you notice, Nobody has cracked any funnies terrorism isn't that funny.
I'm not derailing the thread discussing anything else, bump it if you feel something was offensive and I'll clarify.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

"I quoted nedusa not you if you notice,"

A) Yes, you did quote Nedusa, but since when on this forum are responses strictly confined to member who have been specifically quoted? Or is this another Kizzy Law of: "Do What I Say Not What I Do?" because haven't you constantly responded to my posts when I have quoted others and not you?

B) I answered your post because, although you quoted Nedusa, you also included me in your post when you stated: "having you and others mocking does nothing to change this". Because I am NOT Nedusa, I must qualify therefore, as one of the 'others'. As one of the 'others', I am being accused by you of 'mocking' you. Therefore, my already proper RIGHT TO REPLY' is further legitimised.

"Nobody has cracked any funnies terrorism isn't that funny."

C) I think that anyone familiar with this forum and our respective posts on threads relating to terrorism, will already be aware of just which one of us has most accorded terrorism with its due gravity. If anyone reading this is not so familiar, then they have only to browse the said threads, and they will readily witness that my comprehensive and very serious posts far outweigh yours, so I do not need a lesson in the gravity of terrorism - especially from you.

D) The above truth said, the gravest of subject matters being discussed never precludes levity as light relief. You yourself are a devotee of such a practice, and have joined in on jokes and banter during serious discussion on various threads which have a serious topic. Have you forgotten this? Or is this another Kizzy Law of: "Do What I Say Not What I Do?"

E) I would ask that you re-examine the posts on this thread, when you will see examples of humour in the posts. So, though you may not appreciate the joke, I assure you that 'funnies' have been well and truly 'cracked'.

"I'm not derailing the thread discussing anything else, bump it if you feel something was offensive and I'll clarify."

F) Once again, you make a false accusation in your post, then when that falsehood is quite legitimately countered with the TRUTH, you seek to resort to 'Damage Limitation' by uttering; "I'm not derailing the thread discussing anything else".

G) You are the very one who brought in the subject of 'Mockery' by claiming you are being mocked, yet now you refuse to discuss my rebuttal because it will "derail" the thread. If the subject of mockery can truly be said to be derailing the thread, then you have the most culpability being the one who introduced the subject in the first place.

Anyway, this response has been both legitimate and civil, and I hope now we can leave it here and agree to disagree.