About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

arista · 03-04-2015, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

no she embarrassed herself and did not respect democracy.

Dave dealt with her immature petulance well

Fecking Bang On Right LT

Rules are Rules

Kizzy · 03-04-2015, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

take note of what, thinking she is above the rules, ruining people's enjoyment, shouting like an oik. It was embarrassing. If she is so keen go and stand for a party and make a difference.

It was an impromptu plea, and there was no law in place she was free to speak...we all are, for now.
Kudos to her, it was a good point well made. She may not wish to become a cog in the system, that doesn't mean her voice should be so small it can't be heard.

arista · 03-04-2015, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It was an impromptu plea, and there was no law in place she was free to speak...we all are, for now.
Kudos to her, it was a good point well made. She may not wish to become a cog in the system, that doesn't mean her voice should be so small it can't be heard.

The Cogs Are Turning
is the best way

Everyone who went in there read a notice
that Scatty 33year old hag
Broke the Studio Rule
Fact

Kizzy · 03-04-2015, 03:57 PM

Rules are like promises, made to be broken. Cameron should be more able than most to identify with that.

joeysteele · 03-04-2015, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

I agree, bit ironic that she wants each countries votes counted in referendum on Europe so they won't be dragged out when her party would have taken Scotland out of Europe had they won a yes vote

She wouldn't have Cherie to be fair, the SNP wanted to remain part of the EU or join it if they couldn't at the point of independence.

I myself really believe in the 18 monthns to 2 year period before independence was in force for Scotland that the Eu would have accommodated them and fasttracked them as members too.

In fact it was the UK that as a memebr of the EU had Scotland left the UK, who maybe should have been forced to look at its EU status,after all without Scotland the United Kingdom is no longer in fact the United Kingdom at all.

It is SNP policy to be in the EU, the SNP wants Scotland to remain in the EU, hence why with 3 other Nations as part of the UK, I think she had a valid point as to that all Nations of the UK should agree to leaving the EU via a referendum and not just have the South of England in the main dictate to the whole of the rest of the UK.

Kizzy · 03-04-2015, 04:03 PM

I agree it was just one of the scare tactics used to ensure a no for some that Scotland would be forced out of the EU if they gained independence.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...-eu-membership

arista · 03-04-2015, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Rules are like promises, made to be broken. Cameron should be more able than most to identify with that.

Not in a 2 Hour Important Debate

Kizzy · 03-04-2015, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

Not in a 2 Hour Important Debate

Important being the operative word. She wanted answers and reassurances that the country would be safe, and was there in front of the most powerful people in the country.. It's an opportunity that would most likely never happen again.
And she spoke, as is her right.

joeysteele · 03-04-2015, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

Not in a 2 Hour Important Debate

Then he should have agreed to do more debates to possibly do so and then be challenged on same.

arista · 03-04-2015, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Important being the operative word. She wanted answers and reassurances that the country would be safe, and was there in front of the most powerful people in the country.. It's an opportunity that would most likely never happen again.
And she spoke, as is her right.

But Kizzy she had No Mic
it does not work

Cherie · 03-04-2015, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

She wouldn't have Cherie to be fair, the SNP wanted to remain part of the EU or join it if they couldn't at the point of independence.

I myself really believe in the 18 monthns to 2 year period before independence was in force for Scotland that the Eu would have accommodated them and fasttracked them as members too.

In fact it was the UK that as a memebr of the EU had Scotland left the UK, who maybe should have been forced to look at its EU status,after all without Scotland the United Kingdom is no longer in fact the United Kingdom at all.

It is SNP policy to be in the EU, the SNP wants Scotland to remain in the EU, hence why with 3 other Nations as part of the UK, I think she had a valid point as to that all Nations of the UK should agree to leaving the EU via a referendum and not just have the South of England in the main dictate to the whole of the rest of the UK.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I agree it was just one of the scare tactics used to ensure a no for some that Scotland would be forced out of the EU if they gained independence.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...-eu-membership

I just found it a bit hypocritical of her as her party would have taken Scotland out albeit temporarily, there were no guarantees of re entry. Even though I thought she came across well I wouldn't want SNP to be part of a coalition, The SNP only wish to feather Scotlands nest and have no interest in what happens elsewhere if they can swing no tuition fees and prescription charges what would they do if the got into Westminster.

arista · 03-04-2015, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Then he should have agreed to do more debates to possibly do so and then be challenged on same.

You are talking Rubbish

He is doing a QT solo.

on the same night Nick and ED solo

30th of April. BBC1HD

The PM may still go on Ch5HD Wright Stuff
Blair went on that and a Women got out of her chair
to attack him

Kizzy · 03-04-2015, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

But Kizzy she had No Mic
it does not work

I heard her ok, and as Joey said more debates would have been an excellent idea, maybe they could have incorporated more freeform debate?

Kizzy · 03-04-2015, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

You are talking Rubbish

He is doing a QT solo.

on the same night Nick and ED solo

30th of April. BBC1HD

The PM may still go on Ch5HD Wright Stuff
Blair went on that and a Women got out of her chair
to attack him

It makes perfect sense to me too.

arista · 03-04-2015, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I heard her ok, and as Joey said more debates would have been an excellent idea, maybe they could have incorporated more freeform debate?

But others in there did not
you have to have a Mic.

No Kizzy your bad order
days are gone

Kizzy · 03-04-2015, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

But others in there did not
you have to have a Mic.

No Kizzy your bad order
days are gone

They're not gone... she spoke didn't she?

joeysteele · 03-04-2015, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

I just found it a bit hypocritical of her as her party would have taken Scotland out albeit temporarily, there were no guarantees of re entry. Even though I thought she came across well I wouldn't want SNP to be part of a coalition, The SNP only wish to feather Scotlands nest and have no interest in what happens elsewhere if they can swing no tuition fees and prescription charges what would they do if the got into Westminster.

Well the SNP has been able to do that as to tuition fees and prescription charges because they are doing so well as a Scottish parliament.
Our govts; chose not to do those things here but how a great many wish they would.

If she could influence and bring that about, then for me the sooner we have the SNP in support for a UK govt; the better.
They don;t have to get into westminster they are already there,they have 6 MPs at present.
Also in 1979,the Conservative party was glad they were there too because they voted with the Conservatives to bring down the Callaghan Labour govt; in the Conservative party's motion of no confidence in that govt;

The SNP have been in Westminster for decades now and in my view if the Scots elect 20 or especially far more than that of them in May, then they have every right to be involved in govt; if they are prepared to support a party in govt; to ensure stability of UK govt:

joeysteele · 03-04-2015, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

You are talking Rubbish

He is doing a QT solo.

on the same night Nick and ED solo

30th of April. BBC1HD

The PM may still go on Ch5HD Wright Stuff
Blair went on that and a Women got out of her chair
to attack him

No one is talking rubbish people are saying what they think arista.

The QT programme is not a debate where other leaders could challenge directly each other on what they say, and you know fine well it isn't too.

He,and 'only he' wouldn't do any more leaders debates as you also well know.

arista · 03-04-2015, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

No one is talking rubbish people are saying what they think arista.

The QT programme is not a debate where other leaders could challenge directly each other on what they say, and you know fine well it isn't too.

He,and 'only he' wouldn't do any more leaders debates as you also well know.

Yes we all know why
the Broadcasters Fecked up
they first said no Greens

The Fecking Bossy BBC screwed up this years
debates (Spending over a year Fecking it up)

ITV had the best one
Fact

Cherie · 03-04-2015, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Well the SNP has been able to do that as to tuition fees and prescription charges because they are doing so well as a Scottish parliament.
Our govts; chose not to do those things here but how a great many wish they would.

If she could influence and bring that about, then for me the sooner we have the SNP in support for a UK govt; the better.
They don;t have to get into westminster they are already there,they have 6 MPs at present.
Also in 1979,the Conservative party was glad they were there too because they voted with the Conservatives to bring down the Callaghan Labour govt; in the Conservative party's motion of no confidence in that govt;

The SNP have been in Westminster for decades now and in my view if the Scots elect 20 or especially far more than that of them in May, then they have every right to be involved in govt; if they are prepared to support a party in govt; to ensure stability of UK govt:

That's the thing though Joey I think she would only be interested in promoting Scottish issues to the detriment of the rest.