FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() -- |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
-
|
Those T&C's are always updated last minute. Take with a pinch of salt.
Vote to Evict gets them the most revenue for Big Brother - whilst Vote to Save means they can milk the revenue from the fan bases of the celebrities. I've never really understood the love for VTS. I don't vote. But I can imagine when your voting, you vote for the person you like, in a VTS, or the person you least like in a VTE, not the person who is on screen longer. VTS isn't even good at keeping the big characters, TBH. In CBB14, Frenchy was evicted in a Vote to Save, with almost the entire house up alongside her. In CBB15, Calum (all though I like him) obviously got the most amount votes by a landslide, leaving Alicia, Perez, and Nadia fighting with just 1% between them. All of which were much bigger characters than Calum. VTS doesn't keep the entertaining ones in. It keeps the ones with the biggest fan bases. You can't guarantee that just because someone is on screen more than another housemate, they will be saved. They may have a smaller fan base, and therefore be evicted. Why do you think TOWIE/MIC/GS contestants do quite well. It's cause they have big fan bases voting to keep them in, not because they're entertaining. VTS suxs. I don't mind it for CBB, but BB must be VTE. I like the idea of Who goes, you decide, rather than Who stays, you decide. Last edited by Jason.; 30-04-2015 at 08:03 PM. |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|