[user104658]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

If they consent to having sex under certain conditions and then it turns out they will be having sex under conditions they did not agree to.. that is rape.

And if they have sex with a man because they think he is rich hoping to benefit from that fact by providing sexual favours, that is prostitution. Surely?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

If they consent to having sex under certain conditions and then it turns out they will be having sex under conditions they did not agree to.. that is rape.

Conditions, what conditions? it's sex not a proposal of marriage, there's no contract to be signed.

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Conditions, what conditions? it's sex not a proposal of marriage, there's no contract to be signed.

In this scenario the conditions would be that they would be having sex 'because he is wealthy' and so that is what they agreed to. Whether or not that is morally correct is another argument, but I would say that this would be rape. Not as severe as other types but rape nonetheless.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

In this scenario the conditions would be that they would be having sex 'because he is wealthy' and so that is what they agreed to. Whether or not that is morally correct is another argument, but I would say that this would be rape. Not as severe as other types but rape nonetheless.

It wasn't rape in any sense of the word.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

In this scenario the conditions would be that they would be having sex 'because he is wealthy' and so that is what they agreed to. Whether or not that is morally correct is another argument, but I would say that this would be rape. Not as severe as other types but rape nonetheless.

I will agree with you ONLY on the premise that the woman has explicitly stated before engaging in sexual intercourse that they are only doing it because they believe the man to be wealthy.

Which is a technicality; I doubt that has happened very often, if ever.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

If they consent to having sex under certain conditions and then it turns out they will be having sex under conditions they did not agree to.. that is rape.

and is it rape if it's the other way round and it's the woman who lied?

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

and is it rape if it's the other way round and it's the woman who lied?

Yes of course it would be.

I'm not going to bother replying to this thread anymore because it is obvious that nobody agrees with me though I have my opinions and I will stick with them

[Joyce M Short]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

Yes of course it would be.

I'm not going to bother replying to this thread anymore because it is obvious that nobody agrees with me though I have my opinions and I will stick with them

JoshBB-

You're correct. There are cases in London where women were tried, and convicted of rape by fraud.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Joyce M Short

JoshBB-

You're correct. There are cases in London where women were tried, and convicted of rape by fraud.

..do you have any website links to those cases, Joyce..?...it would be interesting to read about them...

[user104658]

I would also point out Josh, that if what youre saying is taken as true, then any woman who has sex with a man who has not seen her without make-up on is "raping him".

It's nonsense. People lie about all sorts of things. The correct course of action is, only have sex with someone if you feel sexually attracted to them and want to have sex. No ulterior motives. Then it isn't a problem.

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I would also point out Josh, that if what youre saying is taken as true, then any woman who has sex with a man who has not seen her without make-up on is "raping him".

It's nonsense. People lie about all sorts of things. The correct course of action is, only have sex with someone if you feel sexually attracted to them and want to have sex. No ulterior motives. Then it isn't a problem.

Not at all. In the situation mentioned the person explicitly told a lie for sex. If a guy has not seen a woman without makeup and has sex with them, it would only technically be rape if she lied about what she looked like without makeup or something like that.

[Liam-]

No-one is forcing these women to jump into bed with them, if they want to get it on with someone because they think they're rich or successful but in reality the guy isn't, then more fool them and their shallowness imo.

[Kyle]

The thread that keeps on giving.

I'm going to bookmark this one.

[RichardG]

Isn't rape when you force someone have sex with you against their will?? Regardless of what either one said to each other beforehand, so long as they both consented then I don't see how it could be classified as rape. Perhaps it's morally questionable to lie about such a thing to try and get someone to sleep with you but so long as he doesn't use that reason as an excuse to 'push' or 'force' himself onto her - physically or mentally - and she fully accepts the sex, then I guess I don't really see an actual legal problem here.

[kirklancaster]

It ain't rape - it's prostitution.

[Joyce M Short]

Originally Posted by RichardG

Isn't rape when you force someone have sex with you against their will?? Regardless of what either one said to each other beforehand, so long as they both consented then I don't see how it could be classified as rape. Perhaps it's morally questionable to lie about such a thing to try and get someone to sleep with you but so long as he doesn't use that reason as an excuse to 'push' or 'force' himself onto her - physically or mentally - and she fully accepts the sex, then I guess I don't really see an actual legal problem here.

In most states, consent is ineffective (legal ease for not-valid) if induced by deception. This basically means that no consent is given when sex is induced by deception.

In all acts of fraud, the victim provides what seems to be consent because they have yet to realize they have been tricked. Example- Bernie Madoff defrauded thousands of people of their assets. They not only agreed to give him thier money, they actually called their brokers or bankers and transferred funds in Madoff-managed accounts. But we have recognized that the deception invalidated their consent, and deemed their consent, no consent at all.

[Niamh.]

Josh I can't believe someone actually agreed with this

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Josh I can't believe someone actually agreed with this

Josh's heart is always in the right place!

I think the only problem is distinguishing between what's moral and what should actually be legislated against. No one would argue that lying to get sex is a crappy thing to do (and also INCREDIBLY sad...) but then, having sex with someone just because they're (supposedly) rich if you wouldn't have wanted to otherwise is pretty crappy too... So it sort of cancels out for me on the morality scales .

I mean, pretending to be a millionaire for sex is bad, but surely it's much better than pretending that you love someone for sex? And how many people do that!

[Niamh.]

Also all you people comparing it to a woman wearing make up instead of a like for like situation as if a man would never sleep with a woman because he was after her money

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Also all you people comparing it to a woman wearing make up instead of a like for like situation as if a man would never sleep with a woman because he was after her money

Fair point, lots of cougars around these days

[Crimson Dynamo]

#justiceforgolddiggers

[DylanD]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

So you tell a woman or man that you're a city banker instead of telling them you actually work in Maccy D's so they'll sleep with you.
Is this rape?
Well according to some feminists it should be illegal and a prisonable offence called 'rape by fraud'

Youtube video

What do you think?Is this 'rape by fraud'? Or just some crazy women wanting revenge for being lied to?

Strange how when a woman speaks out, she's labelled a Feminist. As for stating it's nothing more than seeking revenge for being lied to, perhaps instead you should be asking yourself this question: "Would I be okay with being lied to by someone pretending to be someone else?" We all tell lies at times. We tell someone they don't look fat because we don't want to hurt their feelings or we lie and make an excuse when late for work. This is something else entirely. This is about men (and women) who deliberately lie about who they are to get what they want. If you're intimate with someone, wouldn't you want and expect them to be honest with you? Or is it okay to lie, con, dupe and manipulate so long as you get what you want out of it? Would you be okay if your daughter was lied to, conned and duped and manipulated, or would you call them whiny little feminist bitches seeking revenge? Sure, there are women and men out there seeking casual sex but that's not what this is about. Look at the bigger picture before judging.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by DylanD

Strange how when a woman speaks out, she's labelled a Feminist. As for stating it's nothing more than seeking revenge for being lied to, perhaps instead you should be asking yourself this question: "Would I be okay with being lied to by someone pretending to be someone else?" We all tell lies at times. We tell someone they don't look fat because we don't want to hurt their feelings or we lie and make an excuse when late for work. This is something else entirely. This is about men (and women) who deliberately lie about who they are to get what they want. If you're intimate with someone, wouldn't you want and expect them to be honest with you? Or is it okay to lie, con, dupe and manipulate so long as you get what you want out of it? Would you be okay if your daughter was lied to, conned and duped and manipulated, or would you call them whiny little feminist bitches seeking revenge? Sure, there are women and men out there seeking casual sex but that's not what this is about. Look at the bigger picture before judging.

You make very good points.But the question is'nt wether lying is moral,It's not nice to be lied to but the question is wether it is a form of rape and should be illegal and a prisonable offence.
Not judging,Just asking the question.
My opinion is that lying to impress somebody is not nice but it is not and should not be illegal.If it was then anybody who lies to their GF/BF would end up in court whenever they had a falling out.It would open up a whole can of worms in the courts when couples break up and hate each other.Divorce hearings would be full of 'rape fraud' accusations.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by DylanD

Strange how when a woman speaks out, she's labelled a Feminist. As for stating it's nothing more than seeking revenge for being lied to, perhaps instead you should be asking yourself this question: "Would I be okay with being lied to by someone pretending to be someone else?" We all tell lies at times. We tell someone they don't look fat because we don't want to hurt their feelings or we lie and make an excuse when late for work. This is something else entirely. This is about men (and women) who deliberately lie about who they are to get what they want. If you're intimate with someone, wouldn't you want and expect them to be honest with you? Or is it okay to lie, con, dupe and manipulate so long as you get what you want out of it? Would you be okay if your daughter was lied to, conned and duped and manipulated, or would you call them whiny little feminist bitches seeking revenge? Sure, there are women and men out there seeking casual sex but that's not what this is about. Look at the bigger picture before judging.

Lying and pretending to be someone you're not isn't moral, I wouldn't be ok with it, it's a ****ty thing to do... But would I make it illegal or brand the person who did it as a rapist?? Errrr let me think. No. That would be an absolutely behemoth overreaction. People lie. If we start locking them up for it the world will be pretty empty.

Wife: "I'm leaving you... I'm not happy. I've fallen out of love with you."
Husband: "but we had sex last night... And you said you loved me!"
Wife: "I'm sorry, I lied. I don't love you."
Husband: "you lied?? Rape! False pretences! I have been violated, you beast, off to jail with you!"

[Joyce M Short]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Lying and pretending to be someone you're not isn't moral, I wouldn't be ok with it, it's a ****ty thing to do... But would I make it illegal or brand the person who did it as a rapist?? Errrr let me think. No. That would be an absolutely behemoth overreaction. People lie. If we start locking them up for it the world will be pretty empty.

Wife: "I'm leaving you... I'm not happy. I've fallen out of love with you."
Husband: "but we had sex last night... And you said you loved me!"
Wife: "I'm sorry, I lied. I don't love you."
Husband: "you lied?? Rape! False pretences! I have been violated, you beast, off to jail with you!"

Toy Soldier_

You're being ridiculous. People have a right to change their mind. The person she had sex with was her husband, and she knew it was her husband. He did not conduct "false personation" to have sex with her.