Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysteele
Exactly I did this in another thread ages ago, they just ignored it then too.
You are right it takes the figures of 2010, even at the very lowest estimate from around the figure you state above to well over 300,000 minimum now in 2015.
Some people seem to think that is right and fine for a figure to rise like that in just over 4 years.
That is for me, when they lose the argument totally, they say it is left wing propaganda as a dismissal of the facts.
Hey. well I am from the left now and from what I see on here now, how glad I am as to that and I changed from such a party that has such hardline support.
Before anyone says I am getting at Conservative voters there, think before you say it, after the insults and rubbish that has been thrown at Labour supporters these last few weeks and the derision I have had to put up with.
I have always stated usage over people as to statistics.
Which is in fact, looking at usage even more damning as to the govt; in power at the time, since it seems people are now needing to use them more than once anyway now.
In 2010 being the rarity to do so, just over 4 years later, almost heading to be the norm.
Another fact, some will ignore because of their scant disregard for anyone elses view that is daring to think their precious Conservative govt; could even be wrong on anything.
|
I'm thinking of having a brick wall installed on a thread we can bash our heads on

What is obvious is that statistics which praise the govt are accepted and agreed with without question, though those like these that show that food bank use that ultimately in 2015 is humiliating to a rich nation such as ours are immediately disbelieved.
It's laughable, I think the term is 'blind faith'.