Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy
So he was just effectively a 'whistleblower'?
I disagree with these hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil clauses, if there is bad practice, mismanagement or abuse of position then it should be everyones right to out it.
|
It doesn't matter what you disagree with though Kizzy, if he signed a clause and he broke it then he broke the law.
He would have had official options he could have taken had there been any issues that he was aware of instead he chose to sell information to the papers.
Threaded Mode