[ozzyshaggah]

cant stand marc but he is correct chloe is borrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing

[Videostar]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

Maybe she was crying because she had two of the biggest idiots in BB history telling her that they nominated her because she's boring and the least deserving and whatever else? Food for thought.

Idiots or not they are correct about her.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by rionablue

All this crying at being nominated. Take it on the chin FFS. Did Chloe think she would sail to the final. I was gobsmacked when I heard she had been nominated today as I thought Jack or Sam would be first in the firing line. Now I see what the bunker gang meant.

The clique in the house is Danny Chloe Cristian and Jack. They will never nominate each other so unless that group is broken up they will sail into the final as they will pick off Jade Sam Simon Nick Joel and Marc. Looking at the clique individually none ONE of them deserves to be in the final of BB this year as they have been the weakest and most boring of all the housemates.

BB is a game. Someone has to be nominated every week and they should ****ing take it on the chin and get on with things. And her little buddies fawning over her in the bedroom. !!!! I have changed my mind. Chloe or any of the other members of the clique that may be nominated (and I hope they are) should go before Harry is evicted.

..some housemates rant/go quiet/cry etc, they all take being nominated differently and Chloe reacted by crying/being openly upset..that's being honest isn't it..it's an honest and natural reaction..?...I thing with these nominations as well/the way they have been done is particularly harsh on the housemates because they're largely being nominated by what they see as public opinion with the exes so also in a way quite likened also to being evicted...I know their not evictions and just nominations but because the exes have talked about how the public are seeing them for Chloe and Harry it's...oh the public don't like me so yeah that would probably be quite upsetting, wouldn't it...

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Do people really believe that Chloe, a woman in her mid 20's who has been brought up in an environment of crime, whose father is serving time for drug dealing, cries at the simplest, and stupidest of reasons?

Nah, please don't fall for this act.

Low blow bringing her family troubles into it, that has nothing to do with her character.

[bots]

Originally Posted by reece(:

Low blow bringing her family troubles into it, that has nothing to do with her character.

it has everything to do with her character.

[Rorkimaru]

Originally Posted by reece(:

Low blow bringing her family troubles into it, that has nothing to do with her character.

Not talking ill of the girl but our family plays a huge part of defining our character. I'm not saying she's a criminal or anything close to that. Just that our family shapes who we are.

[waterhog]

i disagree - infarct she has shown a side that appeals to me - i will do a poem for chloe - i like her.

[mrflibble]

Originally Posted by Rorkimaru

Not talking ill of the girl but our family plays a huge part of defining our character. I'm not saying she's a criminal or anything close to that. Just that our family shapes who we are.

Yes it does, but making assumptions on someone's character based on YOUR opinions/views of what someone else did is and how they must be as a person is where it becomes irrelevant. I haven't read anything about Chloe's life or her father, so I'm not sure if she did grow up in an environment of crime or not but regardless, why do people assume that this would make you hard as nails and immune to criticism? Maybe she did grow up in this life of crime and it's made her more sensitive? Maybe she was completely unaware of this 'crime' element in her family and she is naturally sensitive? Maybe neither and she is putting on act. It's not our place to judge. Not all people involved in illegal activities are the Sopranos. They can be regular people too. And it doesn't necessarily mean their family members follow suit.

[Rorkimaru]

Originally Posted by mrflibble

Yes it does, but making assumptions on someone's character based on YOUR opinions/views of what someone else did is and how they must be as a person is where it becomes irrelevant. I haven't read anything about Chloe's life or her father, so I'm not sure if she did grow up in an environment of crime or not but regardless, why do people assume that this would make you hard as nails and immune to criticism? Maybe she did grow up in this life of crime and it's made her more sensitive? Maybe she was completely unaware of this 'crime' element in her family and she is naturally sensitive? Maybe neither and she is putting on act. It's not our place to judge. Not all people involved in illegal activities are the Sopranos. They can be regular people too. And it doesn't necessarily mean their family members follow suit.

I was merely refuting that her family troubles have no bearing on her character. I'm not passing judgement on the girl, she seems nice but is a bit like a ricecake. Nothing memorable to offer or to take your notice.

Whether it made her mean or meek or anything in between her family and their troubles have certainly influenced her character, it's just not up to us to say in what way.

[sosadbbend]

Originally Posted by adamski94

It's here game plan crying 9/10 gets the public onside

I don't buy this comment! The public are not stupid! We all know Simon's crying antics are fake ( after he didn't deny it in a convo with Helen) and we can tell Chloe is genuinely upset, so why shouldn't she cry?

[Rorkimaru]

Originally Posted by sosadbbend

I don't buy this comment! The public are not stupid! We all know Simon's crying antics are fake ( after he didn't deny it in a convo with Helen) and we can tell Chloe is genuinely upset, so why shouldn't she cry?

If Chloe were fake crying she should consider doing a bit of acting. I believed her at any rate.