FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() -- |
View Poll Results: ? | ||||||
Noms are a vital part of the show, no matter how 'twisted' they've become |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 45.71% | |||
|
||||||
I'd like to see something like an IAC system put into place, just to try it out |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 42.86% | |||
|
||||||
I'm happy to see a different system adopted, just not that one |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 11.43% | |||
|
||||||
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
-
|
Basically, are you happy with the way things are currently (nom twists/meddling from production), or would you be happy with them trying an IAC type voting system (in which each week the entire house is up for eviction with the housemate with the least votes to save leaving)?
It'd see the end of nominations but obviously noms are such a non-thing now (with only one normal set of nominations so far this series) |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Can I get a witness?
|
I'd like to see this for one year at least, I've always thought that they should have developed this format for UBB.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Pete.; 17-06-2015 at 08:28 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
cancelled
|
i like vote to evict.......still could have the whole house up
........but we would miss nominations.....maybe C5 will bring them back......... Mark L |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I've been thinking this, I think it would be a good idea, also I'd like VTS back
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
No, the reason I'm tiring of the show atm is because they insist on messing around with the nominations so much. If they flat-out abandoned them altogether, that would probably be the last straw for me.
In a series of BBAU, for the first half of the series they had a public vote with the bottom three being the week's nominations, and then the housemates had to do an eviction vote (so, pretty much the regular format reversed). If they were going to abandon nominations in favour of the public vote, I'd only be okay with this, but even then I wouldn't love it because I just want nominations. ![]() Last edited by Lostie!; 17-06-2015 at 11:23 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
I've thought for a while now they should do something like this, but instead of it being singular weekly votes, have it as a rolling vote that continues throughout the series and maybe you could have leaderboard updates each week (not revealed to the house, but to the viewers). It'd make it more of a competition between fans then and I think it'd generate a lot of revenue and would of course ensure we got rid of the most dispensable characters first.
Alternatively they could just adopt the superior BBUS format and be done with it. They seem to want drama and gameplay so... |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
more more more
|
No. They should just go back to housemates nominating in secret in the diary room every week. Enough of the twists.
__________________
- Jade Martina Lynch -
polyamorous queen ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I wouldn't mind if everyone was up as long as at least half the house each week could compete for immunity individually each week. I don't think having it all be on the public would really work because ensuring you're not up for eviction is a part of the game.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Locke.
|
The IAC eviction process is the worst thing about the show. Anything but that.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Now that normal noms are non existent in the main, I would prefer to see all the housemates up for eviction each week and the public voting as to that each week.
There could still be a noms process in that they nominate who should not face the eviction vote each week, and the one that tops the vote is safe that week. For me, the loss of normal noms and evictions is a very bad situation but I don't expect regular normal noms anymore sadly. So hand it over to the public as to them all every week. Make it vote to save too rather than evict and they will rake the funds in too,when viewers can then get behind their favourites all through the series. Last edited by joeysteele; 17-06-2015 at 07:26 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I'd quite like VTS with them all up for the last 3 weeks - that would get a couple of the dead wood HMs out before the final.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
It would work for CBB but not normal BB
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They wouldn't dare have such a system. The producers need to have full control over who stays and goes now.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
which baffles me actually as why VTE was put back in place a couple of years go ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I dont think it would make a difference but at least it would be fairer than the current system which is 'anything goes'
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Focus
|
noms are the big game element to it
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
People are more eager to vote out housemates they hate or that cause a huge fuss like Helen than vote to save housemates they like. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|