[Withano]

Originally Posted by lewis111

I think we have the right to judge someone it there a homophobic bully surely

Did your opinions on both Marc and Danny go down today? Or just Danny?

[Chilltown]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Absolutely not and to be quite honest I'm pretty sick of this witch hunt that seems to be going on over the last 24 hours against Danny and now seemingly Marc. I'm not even that much of a fan of Danny's but the whole thing is pathetic. Who cares what he tweeted a few months ago, or in the case of Marc, two years ago? It is totally and utterly irrelevant to what he is doing in the house.

The same goes for people who like to dig for dirt on other housemates, criticising them for being prostitutes, or not having a job, the list goes on. The point of this show is to judge the people that partake on a blank slate based upon what they do inside the house, not out of it. Their jobs and personal lives are totally irrelevant and quite frankly I think it's pretty disgusting that year on year all of their lives are uncovered either by forumers and/or the press.

The housemates are just people taking part in a reality show that we watch for 48 minutes a night, it's not akin to a gunman shooting down a school and then people wanting to monitor their old social media activity. It just goes to show that if you're going to appear on a show like this then you really need to be careful about what you've posted on the internet before, but as far as I'm concerned they shouldn't have to be.

I have to say, very well said. I think I'll back off of the talk regarding social media then.

[Jamie89]

Yes we judge people on everything we know about them. You can't really help it. And as BB fans, we're probably the most judgemental of all

[jennyjuniper]

I think so. Especially if, like the Weazel he is trying to promote the image of a caring, humble ordinary guy who looks down his nose at fame wannabees, when in reality he is a nasty, self serving fame *****. Then it's right to expose what that person is like.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

I've always judged people on what they've done before the show.. But Adam from Deanas year and Dappy left to overwhelming cheers.. (Katie Hopkins also came 2nd but I always secretly liked her, most of the time, before she went in the house #controversialopinions)

With the threads on both of Danny and Marcs disgusting tweets from a few years back, do you judge them both or neither of them?

I've also seen some people judge Chloe for her past of ****ting in somebodys shoes?

Since when is January a few years back?

Just 6 short months ago, Danny said he hoped a sexual assault victim was bullied in the street.

But that isn't even the main thing I am judging him on. His violent outburst in the house (at least 4 now) are what he should be judged on and he isn't being because he has the same agent as Emma and Rylan.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I didn't think they would be allowed to have the disclaimer thing at the start...you know 'the cases are REAL, the judgements are REAL' if that was a lie

I think the cases and the judgements are real, I mean, she can arrange for a copper to accompany someone to pick up their gear, she gives stuff back to the rightful owner etc... but as far as I know any cash award is paid by the show. And at least she's a real judge, not like Rinder who's a barrister. He has showbiz connections though, he was best man at Benedict Cumberbatch's wedding.

[Ammi]

..this is what I used to like most about the civilian BB because we didn't know anything about the housemates before they went into the show but I think that's not always the case now, so people are judged or pre judged on their lives/their pasts and many things, even their familes/friends are judged sometimes..how is that a 'social experiment' in any way or in the context of an entertainment TV show...


..Jack's post.....

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Withano

I've always judged people on what they've done before the show.. But Adam from Deanas year and Dappy left to overwhelming cheers.. (Katie Hopkins also came 2nd but I always secretly liked her, most of the time, before she went in the house #controversialopinions)

With the threads on both of Danny and Marcs disgusting tweets from a few years back, do you judge them both or neither of them?

I've also seen some people judge Chloe for her past of ****ting in somebodys shoes?

No ,they shouldn't but they are and nothing will change that

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Absolutely not and to be quite honest I'm pretty sick of this witch hunt that seems to be going on over the last 24 hours against Danny and now seemingly Marc. I'm not even that much of a fan of Danny's but the whole thing is pathetic. Who cares what he tweeted a few months ago, or in the case of Marc, two years ago? It is totally and utterly irrelevant to what he is doing in the house.

The same goes for people who like to dig for dirt on other housemates, criticising them for being prostitutes, or not having a job, the list goes on. The point of this show is to judge the people that partake on a blank slate based upon what they do inside the house, not out of it. Their jobs and personal lives are totally irrelevant and quite frankly I think it's pretty disgusting that year on year all of their lives are uncovered either by forumers and/or the press.

The housemates are just people taking part in a reality show that we watch for 48 minutes a night, it's not akin to a gunman shooting down a school and then people wanting to monitor their old social media activity. It just goes to show that if you're going to appear on a show like this then you really need to be careful about what you've posted on the internet before, but as far as I'm concerned they shouldn't have to be.

How are their personal lives irrelevant if they contradict how they are behaving on the show?

Suppose, for example, a woman goes on the show and claims to be devoutly religious and a virgin, but we find out that actually she was a stripper/hooker in the past. How can that not be relevant?

Similarly with Danny, he is building his whole persona in the house around being a gentleman and protecting women and standing up to bullies.......but we now find out that he wished chloe goodman to get bullied in the street.

It is absolutely relevant.

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by Withano

I get what you're saying and I presume many people agree, but so that I can get an idea of the extent in which you believe your statement, if Hitler was hilarious and in the final 2 with Florence nightingale who was a new housemate and was really boring for a fortnight.. Who would you personally prefer to win?

Now THERE'S a show I'd watch

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Since when is January a few years back?

Just 6 short months ago, Danny said he hoped a sexual assault victim was bullied in the street.

But that isn't even the main thing I am judging him on. His violent outburst in the house (at least 4 now) are what he should be judged on and he isn't being because he has the same agent as Emma and Rylan.

I wasn't aware of this tweet, it wasn't the one i had in mind when I made the thread. It's good to know that you enjoy nitpicking even when we share an opinion, at least you're consistent.

Has your opinion on both Danny and Marc gone down today because of their public tweets making their way to the tibb forum? or only Danny?

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

I wasn't aware of this tweet, it wasn't the one i had in mind when I made the thread. It's good to know that you enjoy nitpicking even when we share an opinion, at least you're consistent.

Has your opinion on both Danny and Marc gone down today because of their public tweets making their way to the tibb forum? or only Danny?

I see ignoring me is going well.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by LiamBB

Now THERE'S a show I'd watch

Same! I really do feel like people could defend hitler though if he was up for a laugh and didn't do anything bad inside the house!

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I see ignoring me is going well.

Haha. Every time I searched to see who quoted me, I could see all of your posts anyway so it was pointless. Would you like to answer the question, I'm genuinely intrigued about how these tweets have affected people's views on both Marc and Danny but you only mentioned Danny in your first post.

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by Withano

Same! I really do feel like people could defend hitler though if he was up for a laugh and didn't do anything bad inside the house!

Haha, yeah and got a free pass to the final

[Shaun]

Basically: don't tweet dumb ****.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Haha. Every time I searched to see who quoted me, I could see all of your posts anyway so it was pointless. Would you like to answer the question, I'm genuinely intrigued about how these tweets have affected people's views on both Marc and Danny but you only mentioned Danny in your first post.

I only mentioned Danny because I knew his tweet wasn't "a few years ago" as you stated.

I haven't really seen Marc's tweets. I saw one posted in another thread but I don't know the context of it.

Marc may well go down in my estimation but he was never really that high. But Danny will always be lower due to the 4 incidents of violence in the house.

[ThriceShy]

So what do marc's tweets reveal? Are they anywhere near as bad as danny's?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

So what do marc's tweets reveal? Are they anywhere near as bad as danny's?

Yeah, they're both terrible. I'm kind of struggling to see how either of them can be supported, hence the poll. Needed to see how many people take housemates pasts into consideration.