[jessicadanielle]

Originally Posted by rionablue

Jack has shown in the past few weeks that he thinks he is ABOVE nomination saying and re iterating tonight that nobody has given VALID reasons. You are a bitchy horrible vile lazy so and so. Is that enough for you???? Then TONIGHT when Chloe rightly predicted what the general public voted for Jack and told Jack how it could be perceived Jack jumped down her throat. The girl had CORRECTLY answered the question and added a grand to the prize money and he was all 'Oh I looked out for you and Oh I wrote zero on the whiteboard as you were my friend' CHLOE was right. If someone does a good deed they don't have to keep bringing it up so that the person is always grateful. I cant vote but if I would I would spend every cent I could afford to get that ARROGANT stupid man out. I cant for the LIFE of me figure how he is any way popular. People have to accept critique. If Chloe had said Jack tonight and the public had chosen someone else he might have a reason to argue with her.

VILE VILE VILE Get him out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jack has every right to bring up that he has saved her from eviction TWICE IN TWO DAYS considering Chloe keeps claiming he has changed and that he is untrustworthy. I would be bloody pissed off. He wasn't bringing up some silly favour he did her weeks ago. He's let himself go up for eviction despite being heavily booed and second to last when Simon was evicted. He is really risking being voted out just so that precious bloody Chloe didn't have to face the vote.

Nick was an option for the untrustworthy question, why didn't she pick him?! She has a concrete example of why you could say that Nick wasn't trustworthy - she is currently facing eviction cause he spent £5k of the winner's pot to swap him with her. Yet instead, she picked someone who has somewhat sacrificed himself for her. I completely get where he's coming from.

(Though he does take noms badly, I will agree with that bit).