[Beetlejuice]

She was right to take the money. Anyone with any sense would. Okay? But...

But when you bleat on for days about everyone coming together to get the prize fund up and being a team player... YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE when you then take it

And Chloe's little dig at Jack for having a go at her for taking the 5k after he took the 24k was pathetic. I'm sure he was critical of her taking it after all that she said. Jack on the other hand has never said he would do anything other than take the money.

I actually agreed with Cristian tonight about Chloe. She's got an aggressive side to her that's unpleasant.

[Transgenderqueen]

Totally agree! And now she's favourate to win!!! This cannot happen, please!!!!

[JTM45]

Totally...............but then most of these people aren't the sharpest tools in the toolbox are they.
They voted for Helen to win last year after her "massive and not at all manufactured journey of reflection"

[Withano]

Not a fan of democracy?

I think it was hypocritical of her to expect people not to be mad at her but i see it as her winning 5k and choosing not to contribute to the prizefund... Which is different to stealing a bit of money from the prizefund for personal use..

To me the two scenarios were different to me which is why i dont see it as hypocritical, not sure if the majority of viewers watched with the same logic or if theres just a lot of chloe fans voting on different browsers.

[jennyjuniper]

It was said after Helen's win last year that a sudden, massive injection of cash into the betting odds (I don't much understand about betting and stuff) was the reason she won. Well Chloe has become joint favourite to win with the weazel, due to a 'shrewd large bet' to quote the bookies.

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by Withano

Not a fan of democracy?

Not really. BUt I don't know what that's got to do with anything.

I think it was hypocritical of her to expect people not to be mad at her but i see it as her winning 5k and choosing not to contribute to the prizefund...

That's not what happened at all. She had been critical of people for not contributing to the prize fund and when she had the choice to put 5k back into it she chose to keep it for herself. Perfectly reasonable decision, but hypocritical after saying everything she had.

To me the two scenarios were different to me which is why i dont see it as hypocritical, not sure if the majority of viewers watched with the same logic or if theres just a lot of chloe fans voting on different browsers.

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by jennyjuniper

It was said after Helen's win last year that a sudden, massive injection of cash into the betting odds (I don't much understand about betting and stuff) was the reason she won.

It wasn't.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Beetlejuice

She was right to take the money. Anyone with any sense would. Okay? But...

But when you bleat on for days about everyone coming together to get the prize fund up and being a team player... YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE when you then take it

And Chloe's little dig at Jack for having a go at her for taking the 5k after he took the 24k was pathetic. I'm sure he was critical of her taking it after all that she said. Jack on the other hand has never said he would do anything other than take the money.

I actually agreed with Cristian tonight about Chloe. She's got an aggressive side to her that's unpleasant.

I'm glad Cristian noticed that Chloe wasn't happy for Jack. She was so pissed off about it.

[qwerty42]

she looked devastated lol

[Withano]

If Chloe complained about Joel spending 2.5k on a pizza right before she spent 3k on a kebab, it would have been hypocritical. This is not what happened though. She was asked if she wanted to contribute and she didn't.

2 different things means its not hypocritical to at least 50.1% of viewers.

You don't have to admit youre wrong just because you're in the minority.. but its kind of like you are choosing to refuse to see both sides and thats just a bit childish.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by qwerty42

she looked devastated lol

That was the best thing about it!

[qwerty42]

I cant stand her

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by Withano

If Chloe complained about Joel spending 2.5k on a pizza right before she spent 3k on a kebab, it would have been hypocritical. This is not what happened though. She was asked if she wanted to contribute and she didn't.

You seem to be forgetting all the things she said about how people were taking money out of a prize fund that was probably Danny's and that a real friend wouldn't do that. The money taken out of that prize fund could be put back in it by each of them (5k's worth), and yet she chose to keep it for herself.

2 different things means its not hypocritical to at least 50.1% of viewers.

The viewers who voted in that survey were more concerned with saying something positive about Chloe than the actual truth.

You don't have to admit youre wrong just because you're in the minority.. but its kind of like you are choosing to refuse to see both sides and thats just a bit childish.

There is no other side. It's just an objective fact that she was hypocritical. That the voters in that survey can't understand that, or are more concerned with giving her positive feedback than the truth, doesn't matter.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Withano

If Chloe complained about Joel spending 2.5k on a pizza right before she spent 3k on a kebab, it would have been hypocritical. This is not what happened though. She was asked if she wanted to contribute and she didn't.

2 different things means its not hypocritical to at least 50.1% of viewers.

You don't have to admit youre wrong just because you're in the minority.. but its kind of like you are choosing to refuse to see both sides and thats just a bit childish.

you are trying to make a distinction where one does not exist. Chloe spent the week saying that the money should all go to the winner, including the suitcases etc. Then she took some money for herself. That is hypocrisy

[Withano]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

you are trying to make a distinction where one does not exist. Chloe spent the week saying that the money should all go to the winner, including the suitcases etc. Then she took some money for herself. That is hypocrisy

I know that and id imagine that is why 40% of viewers or more probably voted that she was a hypocrite

But the question was, is she a hypocrite for taking the money.. And obviously the majority said no.. I'd imagine that this is because most people did make a distinction between choosing to not contribute and choosing to steal. They are two different things to me, so to me, in this example alone, she is not a hypocrite.

There is an argument for both sides, to make a thread and not acknowledge theories which contradict your own is childish.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Withano

I know that and id imagine that is why 40% of viewers or more probably voted that she was a hypocrite

But the question was, is she a hypocrite for taking the money.. And obviously the majority said no.. I'd imagine that this is because most people did make a distinction between choosing to not contribute and choosing to steal. They are two different things to me, so to me, in this example alone, she is not a hypocrite.

There is an argument for both sides, to make a thread and not acknowledge theories which contradict your own is childish.

We can't really verify the accuracy of the poll, for example, i voted 5 times saying chloe was a hypocrite. If a few fans each voted 100 times saying she wasn't it would soon skew the result.

The bottom line is that hard line Chloe fans won't care less what she does, and if there are enough of them she will win. Morality and or hypocrisy wont enter into it.

[susie q]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I'm glad Cristian noticed that Chloe wasn't happy for Jack. She was so pissed off about it.

He was just upset that he didnt make it to the button first!

[Withano]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

We can't really verify the accuracy of the poll, for example, i voted 5 times saying chloe was a hypocrite. If a few fans each voted 100 times saying she wasn't it would soon skew the result.

The bottom line is that hard line Chloe fans won't care less what she does, and if there are enough of them she will win. Morality and or hypocrisy wont enter into it.

Id imagine your 4 votes and their 99 got excluded but i agree, the poll could easily be inaccurate. Although the source of the website alone is probably the most reliable place to get a definitive answer, so if it doesn't convince us to swing the other way, nothing else will.

[RodHull]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

you are trying to make a distinction where one does not exist. Chloe spent the week saying that the money should all go to the winner, including the suitcases etc. Then she took some money for herself. That is hypocrisy

THIS

The stupid 'it wasnt on the screen ergo it wasnt anyones money' argument is just semantics.

It was all money in the cash bomb task which according to Chloe (which she said numerous times) should belong to the winner. It was hypocrisy plain and simple.

But then considering half of them in there cant spell canoe the idea that fans of danny/chloe/christian might understand the meaning of the word hypocrisy is a little hopeful.

Id have done exactly what she did, she was and is a hypocrit and her stupid smug face when she realised shed got away with it tonight and would most likely win the whole show was awful

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Beetlejuice

She was right to take the money. Anyone with any sense would. Okay? But...

But when you bleat on for days about everyone coming together to get the prize fund up and being a team player... YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE when you then take it

And Chloe's little dig at Jack for having a go at her for taking the 5k after he took the 24k was pathetic. I'm sure he was critical of her taking it after all that she said. Jack on the other hand has never said he would do anything other than take the money.

I actually agreed with Cristian tonight about Chloe. She's got an aggressive side to her that's unpleasant.

She is dog rough.

Just ask the taxi driver that she tried to fit up on kidnap charges.

[REDCROP]

The money was originally 150 K....it reduced to 50 K because about 90% of the talking that took place in the cash bomb task was by Chloe and Sam....they were in debt to everyone not only with owing an apology that never came but also to the cost of about 90 grand....they would have been putting money back in at every opportunity if they had any self conscious or sense of justice....OF COURSE SHE IS A HYPOCRITE...NO QUESTION

[Pete.]

I voted no because she wasn't a hypocrite at all. I'm glad the majority thought so too

[ThriceShy]

Not sure how many times I have to post this before it sinks in.....

A viewpoint being held by a majority does not make it right.

A majority of americans believe god exists. They are wrong.

Always aligning your view with the majority is sheep-like behaviour. I am always glad when my views don't align with the majority of morons who vote in such polls.

[Crimson Dynamo]

due to a lack of education she is money obsessed as she has no interests

[Tarryn]

I have to say that now I want anyone BUT Chloe to win this.
She seems really spoiled & acts like a Princess.
She kept telling people to shut up last night during the tasks yet did it herself when it was costing them money.
Her face when the results of the pole saying she was not a hypocrite was gloating.
She has turned against Jack for very little reason.
Why was she allowed to come back into the house once she broke out ?.
I was under the impression that once you left.....you left.
She was being a drama queen. She had no intentions of going that day.
I really hope she does not win.