[Robodog]

Originally Posted by MelihV

"CASA Forum defines sexual assault as ...
Indecent exposure e.g. someone showing private parts of their body or 'flashing' their genitals;

bye

Reference: http://www.casa.org.au/casa_pdf.php?document=what_is_SA

Joel had already seen Aaron's meat and two veg in their many baths together. Aaron's flashing was not out of the blue, there was days of a build up between them of playful flirting etc

It's all about context. If not then every husband and wife have 'sexually abused' each other by showing their genitals; every man in the public showers at swimming pools etc are all 'sexual abusers' simply by 'being naked'.

There's a HUGE difference between sexual abuse and nudity. It's all about INTENT and CONTEXT. Aaron's intent was playful and in natural context to their playful relationship, it happened within the safety of a bedroom full of laughing housemates mucking about on the famously raunchy and risque tv show 'big brother' where sexual activity between housemates is expected, applauded and often encouraged. Aaron clearly thought he was in line with such expectations associated with the show.

It belittles REAL sexual abuse to equate Aaron's silly bedroom antics to REAL sexual abusers which is extremely serious by contrast.

'Bye'

.