Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-08-2015, 04:12 PM #1
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
Prejudice on the grounds of race, is racism . By definition.
That would be a literal definition, however the prejudice + power definition is the standard.
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 04:20 PM #2
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy View Post
That would be a literal definition, however the prejudice + power definition is the standard.
It's the standard definition of institutional racism, there's a distinct difference, and it's one that shouldn't be ignored because there is no replacement for the word on its own. Prejudice is a more generalised word that simply doesn't work as a substitute on its own.

You could call it "Negative prejudice on the grounds of race" but... Well... that's just the definition of racism?

Also, pointing out that there is a difference between general racism and institutional racism doesn't somehow dilute the reality of the seriousness of institutional racism... Which seems to be some people's concern.
user104658 is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 04:29 PM #3
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
It's the standard definition of institutional racism, there's a distinct difference, and it's one that shouldn't be ignored because there is no replacement for the word on its own. Prejudice is a more generalised word that simply doesn't work as a substitute on its own.

You could call it "Negative prejudice on the grounds of race" but... Well... that's just the definition of racism?

Also, pointing out that there is a difference between general racism and institutional racism doesn't somehow dilute the reality of the seriousness of institutional racism... Which seems to be some people's concern.
Wait a minute, you can't say prejudice is any less of a word than racism. :/

The literal definition is prejudice on the grounds of race and yet that has no historical connotations to it does it, it doesn't take into account the oppression, repression and suppression does it?
It's a blanket term that 'whitewashes' ( ) the true meaning of racism.
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 05:26 PM #4
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy View Post
Wait a minute, you can't say prejudice is any less of a word than racism. :/

The literal definition is prejudice on the grounds of race and yet that has no historical connotations to it does it, it doesn't take into account the oppression, repression and suppression does it?
It's a blanket term that 'whitewashes' ( ) the true meaning of racism.
I didn't say it's "less" of a word, I pointed out that it's not descriptive enough, there are a million different varieties of prejudice. Prejudice on the grounds of age is ageism, prejudice on the grounds of sex is sexism, prejudice on the grounds of race is racism.

The type of racism you are talking about, both with historical context and with regards to there being an element of power / control today, is called institutional racism. The adjective is important, it's what let's you know what sort of racism we're talking about. It doesn't dilute or whitewash the term "racism". If anything, it adds to the implied severity?
user104658 is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 06:07 PM #5
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
I didn't say it's "less" of a word, I pointed out that it's not descriptive enough, there are a million different varieties of prejudice. Prejudice on the grounds of age is ageism, prejudice on the grounds of sex is sexism, prejudice on the grounds of race is racism.

The type of racism you are talking about, both with historical context and with regards to there being an element of power / control today, is called institutional racism. The adjective is important, it's what let's you know what sort of racism we're talking about. It doesn't dilute or whitewash the term "racism". If anything, it adds to the implied severity?
I am aware what institutional racism is thankyou, by the same token would you say women could be accused of sexism against men?
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 06:43 PM #6
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy View Post
I am aware what institutional racism is thankyou, by the same token would you say women could be accused of sexism against men?
If a woman discriminates against a man purely because he is male, then yes, that woman is being sexist.

Last edited by user104658; 07-08-2015 at 06:43 PM.
user104658 is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 06:54 PM #7
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier View Post
If a woman discriminates against a man purely because he is male, then yes, that woman is being sexist.
Not institutional sexism then?...
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 12-08-2015, 12:18 AM #8
Thotmas's Avatar
Thotmas Thotmas is offline
Ithinkiloveyoutoo | Shhiiiieet 2 yrs l8ta
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 21,270


Thotmas Thotmas is offline
Ithinkiloveyoutoo | Shhiiiieet 2 yrs l8ta
Thotmas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 21,270


Default

Quote:
EXCLUSIVE: 'Kiss my a**!' Rosie Perez QUITS The View early in heated spat with ABC execs after being forced to apologize over her anger at Kelly Osbourne's racist Latino remark
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...dailymailceleb

White privilege is you being forced to apologize when the other person is the one that made the racist comment against your people.

You go booboo you quit that show. From what I hear it sucks anyways.
__________________
Always keep your eyes on the prize
Thotmas is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
clean, comment, deport, kelly, latinos, live, makes, osbourne, racist, toilets, tv


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts