Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 18-11-2015, 10:52 AM #6
RichardG's Avatar
RichardG RichardG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 6,523

Favourites (more):
CBB19: Kim Woodburn
CBB18: Renee Graziano


RichardG RichardG is offline
Senior Member
RichardG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 6,523

Favourites (more):
CBB19: Kim Woodburn
CBB18: Renee Graziano


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie89 View Post
My biggest problem with this is that they're alleged ISIS recruiters, which means they might not actually be ISIS recruiters, and yet they're having their names and addresses revealed? This doesn't fit with a society that bases it's justice system on the ethos of 'innocent until proven guilty'. Very disconcerting
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi View Post
..sorry, I haven't got time to read it all through now, Naimh but I will do that later...quick thoughts though..?...hmmmm, see it's all 'suspected' though and what if any one of those names is wrong and would it lead to any sort of vigilante actions...also, say if a name was published of someone living in your town for instance..?..so then, you and all of your other neighbours and the surrounding people etc would know this name then...and that person would know that you would all know their name..?..so even if it was all correct and they were indeed a potential public danger..?...would they not think, oh well..so that's it, I'll blow us all up now/this whole town because the armed forces will be at my door any second...whereas if the names aren't published, then there could be less chance of any terrorist actions because anyone involved would feel that they hadn't been discovered, when maybe they have by intelligence services and are being watched etc....

...I don't know really, it feels a bit like in the movies..(sorry for the analogy but I'm rushing..)...when there are 'undercover cops' involved for very good reason and very good reason why they don't want to act straight way and then other regular cops come barging in and blow their cover....
Agree with both of these^, plus with what Alex said in the other thread. If taking down ISIS twitter accounts was of significant benefit to the fight against terrorism then the government would have done this a long time ago. What if the intelligence services were monitoring them for some reason or another? We moan about the government's response but there's nothing Anonymous can do that the government couldn't have done long ago if they deemed it necessary and Anon themselves certainly won't be the ones to bring down ISIS. They should stay away from this IMO, it's way too serious a problem and they could easily screw something up for the official investigations.

Last edited by RichardG; 18-11-2015 at 10:56 AM.
RichardG is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
500, account, anonymous, details, isis, publishes, recruiters, takes, twitter


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts