[Withano]

Jesus christ. Take offence at both actions and words.
It is possible to insult a straight person to be insulted by homophobic views obviously.
It was not ganging up, it was popular opinion

I cba to read through your other points actually, the first three was ridiculously stupid

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Withano

Jesus christ. Take offence at both actions and words.
It is possible to insult a straight person to be insulted by homophobic views obviously.
It was not ganging up, it was popular opinion

I cba to read through your other points actually, the first three was ridiculously stupid

Well I could say I am 'offended' that you blastpheme to get your point across !!!! what should I do ? show anger or ignore it ? how silly is all this faux outrage ,I believe some people are protesting far too much.

[Cherie]

Agree with everything you say Gusto, Emma lost any semblance of professionalism last night and I think she needs to step back and not let her personal feelings cloud her judgement. What happened to its all panto? I fully believe Nancy received the fewest votes so they introduced the most ludicrous twist which was only necessary to manipulate who was evicted. No idea why anyone wastes money voting

[GoldHeart]

And yet Jim Davidson won a few years ago and he's everything from racist , sexist and homophobic but yet people liked him even though he's a disgusting pig
He made Brian Dowling cry on hells kitchen and he constantly offends everyone
I can't stand the ukip guy he's nasty but why do the public do selective support for vile idiots
Another example Katie Hopkins and she's a massive cold heartless bitch
That's why I hate big brother and reality shows in general
I can't be bothered with car crash telly but I had to comment on the retarded double standards
How can people love Jim Davidson & Katie Hopkins but hate ukip guy when all 3 are as vile as eachother

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

Words mean nothing.

Apart from the countless times throughout the years when mere words have had terrible effects on the people they've been aimed at. But I suppose that's their own fault for not having a thick enough skin and nothing to do with the person actually being wildly offensive, right?

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Well I could say I am 'offended' that you blastpheme to get your point across !!!! what should I do ? show anger or ignore it ? how silly is all this faux outrage ,I believe some people are protesting far too much.

I'm sorry but people really need to stop pulling out this "faux outrage" card every single time a debate like this comes up, it's so cliched now. Nobody ever seems to be able to back up how they now the anger isn't genuine.

Not just that but it's actually insulting itself. Why is it hard to believe that gay people and certain others who respect gay people / have gay loved ones could be genuinely offended by things like comparing having same sex parents to child abuse and jokes about gay men being predators?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Well I could say I am 'offended' that you blastpheme to get your point across !!!! what should I do ? show anger or ignore it ? how silly is all this faux outrage ,I believe some people are protesting far too much.

There is no faux outrage. People dislike homophobia. There isnt much to be confused about and im shocked that you are.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

There is no faux outrage. People dislike homophobia. There isnt much to be confused about and im shocked that you are.

I'm glad you are speaking for everyone.

In a survey posted on here tonight, 31% of the british people were against gay adoption.

[jet]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I'm glad you are speaking for everyone.

In a survey posted on here tonight, 31% of the british people were against gay adoption.

That's less than I thought. People are becoming more open minded and educated. Good to see!

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by jet

That's less than I thought. People are becoming more open minded and educated. Good to see!

It is 20 million people.

Winston is not the tiny minority people want us to believe.

By the way 16% were don't knows. So only 53% actually voted in favour.

[letmein]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

It is 20 million people.

Winston is not the tiny minority people want us to believe.

By the way 16% were don't knows. So only 53% actually voted in favour.

Winston, the homophobic idiot is gone and gay people can marry and adopt children, get over it! You're wasting your time.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I'm glad you are speaking for everyone.

In a survey posted on here tonight, 31% of the british people were against gay adoption.

Hi, the 31% you keep refferring to was taken by a 2013 poll. Can you think of any historically significant things that has happened with the community since then? ****ing loads. You should research this instead.
Find a 2015 poll if you want to throw around numbers because yes obviously a 2013 poll is already out of date.

Your 2013 poll states that 55% of people believe that homsexuals should be able to get married, this has rose to 71% in the two years. It is very safe to presume that gay adoption views have also taken a dramatic rise too. Judging by those numbers, do you believe Winstons (and your own) views have a place in modern Britain. They do not, you are both among the last to move with the times.

I doubt you want to educate yourself, but just in case, these are the current views of europe. http://www.equineteurope.org/IMG/pdf/ebs_437_en.pdf

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Hi, the 31% you keep refferring to was taken by a 2013 poll. Can you think of any historically significant things that has happened with the community since then? ****ing loads. You should research this instead.
Find a 2015 poll if you want to throw around numbers because yes obviously a 2013 poll is already out of date.

Your 2013 poll states that 55% of people believe that homsexuals should be able to get married, this has rose to 71% in the two years. It is very safe to presume that gay adoption views have also taken a dramatic rise too. Judging by those numbers, do you believe Winstons (and your own) views have a place in modern Britain. They do not, you are both among the last to move with the times.

I doubt you want to educate yourself, but just in case, these are the current views of europe. http://www.equineteurope.org/IMG/pdf/ebs_437_en.pdf

Pssst......I didn't throw the numbers around. The first time I saw that survey was when one of Winston's detractors on here posted it in order to show that 53% were for gay adoption.

But as you are rejecting the survey then we can reject the 53% and go back to the drawing board.

What people don't seem to have worked out is that Winston got more votes than nancy to stay. This witch hunt is confined to some leftists and media luvvies. The rest of us like Winston and realise his views aren't extreme in the slightest.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Pssst......I didn't throw the numbers around. The first time I saw that survey was when one of Winston's detractors on here posted it in order to show that 53% were for gay adoption.

But as you are rejecting the survey then we can reject the 53% and go back to the drawing board.

What people don't seem to have worked out is that Winston got more votes than nancy to stay. This witch hunt is confined to some leftists and media luvvies. The rest of us like Winston and realise his views aren't extreme in the slightest.

We don't know that for sure.

We also don't know why people voted to save him. On this forum the consensus seemed to be that he was more entertaining good/bad than Nancy and Kristina.

You seem to be suggesting he got votes because people agree with his views? Which can't be proven either.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Pssst......I didn't throw the numbers around. The first time I saw that survey was when one of Winston's detractors on here posted it in order to show that 53% were for gay adoption.

But as you are rejecting the survey then we can reject the 53% and go back to the drawing board.

What people don't seem to have worked out is that Winston got more votes than nancy to stay. This witch hunt is confined to some leftists and media luvvies. The rest of us like Winston and realise his views aren't extreme in the slightest.

Yeh, you've thrown around your out of date numbers a lot, its important for you to understand that your argument means zero when you do this.
Your assumptions that Nancy got less votes than Winston isn't worth my time either, because although it is probably incorrect, it is something neither of us can prove.

Hm this whole post is a lot of nothing really.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Withano

There is no faux outrage. People dislike homophobia. There isnt much to be confused about and im shocked that you are.

I get people are outraged, but some of it is over the top (imo)and I know some people don't like homophobia,there are a lot of things in this world I don't like ,but sadly we have to live with some of it,only education and upbringing can change how society is,you must remember the older generation was brought up totally different to now,and they are just as entitalled to their opinions as we are,I am not confused Withano,just taking both sides on board.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I get people are outraged, but some of it is over the top (imo)and I know some people don't like homophobia,there are a lot of things in this world I don't like ,but sadly we have to live with some of it,only education and upbringing can change how society is,you must remember the older generation was brought up totally different to now,and they are just as entitalled to their opinions as we are,I am not confused Withano,just taking both sides on board.

Who is stopping people having an opinion?

Challenging an opinion isn't stopping it btw.

[bots]

Originally Posted by MrWong

Who is stopping people having an opinion?

Challenging an opinion isn't stopping it btw.

Plenty are trying to stop valid opinion with accusations of homophobia etc. One would need to be blind not to see it

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Plenty are trying to stop valid opinion with accusations of homophobia etc. One would need to be blind not to see it

Had the person accused of homophobia made a homophobic comment?

I've see plenty of those comments the past couple of days.