[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

It was edited to an inch of its life ,as has already been proven

I watched it on live feed...very little was missed.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

In your head maybe,they were ALL as bad,and John was clearly joking as they didn't even know whos they were,he said nothing else after,it was the girls who kept on about it and said "I bet they are Stephs",the lads were just being dicks,the THREE lads that is.one thing is for sure thought they KNEW they weren't Gemmas

Sorry I disagree....John went into the bedroom and started telling Daniella and Megan about the knickers in detail and was loving every minute of it. Danielle and Megan said they were not theirs and Gemma said they were not hers ( although judging by the size of them I guess that was obvious)...so obviously they MUST have been Stephs.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I watched it on live feed...very little was missed.

The VITAL bit was missed

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Not at all...they get paid to go in and the winner is the last to leave. The 'WINNER' is the one with the most popularity. What's the point of the game if you don't have a winner?...are they all winners then? NO. The losers leave...the losers get voted out. The Winner is the last to leave....and hopefully it won't be John.

The winner gets no more than any of the others,it's just a title,John wants the money for his mothers care,so job done he's won whether he gets licked out next Tuesday or not,I doubt very much he will be pissed off he doesn't get the 'title' as long as he gets his fee.

[waterhog]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Not at all...they get paid to go in and the winner is the last to leave. The 'WINNER' is the one with the most popularity. What's the point of the game if you don't have a winner?...are they all winners then? NO. The losers leave...the losers get voted out. The Winner is the last to leave....and hopefully it won't be John.

if john went in to raise money or awareness of his mothers needs which he has done - whethere he wins or was booted out first he has done what he went in for which in summing up means he is a WINNER.

just doing a poem on this subject.

I think I am going to call my poem

don't get your knickers in a twist john - you have already won.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by waterhog

if john went in to raise money or awareness of his mothers needs which he has done - whethere he wins or was booted out first he has done what he went in for which in summing up means he is a WINNER.

just doing a poem on this subject.

I think I am going to call my poem

don't get your knickers in a twist john - you have already won.

Looking forward to it hog.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

The winner gets no more than any of the others,it's just a title,John wants the money for his mothers care,so job done he's won whether he gets licked out next Tuesday or not,I doubt very much he will be pissed off he doesn't get the 'title' as long as he gets his fee.

....eh John desperately wants to win. It's more than just a title to some of them.
Getting tired of hearing what Johns there for....we would all do that for our parents given the chance.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

....eh John desperately wants to win. It's more than just a title to some of them.
Getting tired of hearing what Johns there for....we would all do that for our parents given the chance.

They ALL want to win

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

They ALL want to win

Yes they do...but some more than others...

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Yes they do...but some more than others...

The most desperate to win is Gemma by far

[susie q]

Originally Posted by jet

Are you saying the 3 of them simultaneously said whoever owned the knickers should be named and shamed and they should be left on the table - which is what my post was about?
Or will you be big enough to tell the truth and admit it was John AND that he lied to Tiff when he denied it?

Wheres the evidence to support this statement? If theres video footage showing him doing it then you should have posted it in the thread. John may not be the nicest of housemates, but he is definitely not stupid. So why would he lie about not doing it, when he knows there are cameras around picking up every move, and lying would not be to his advantage, either with the public or the other housemates if it should get shown to the house. Until someone comes up with the evidence, I shall go with 'innocent till proven guilty'

[Daniel R]

but where is the lie

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

....eh John desperately wants to win. It's more than just a title to some of them.
Getting tired of hearing what Johns there for....we would all do that for our parents given the chance.

Well ignore his reasons then,it doesn't change the fact his job is done.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by susie q

Wheres the evidence to support this statement? If theres video footage showing him doing it then you should have posted it in the thread. John may not be the nicest of housemates, but he is definitely not stupid. So why would he lie about not doing it, when he knows there are cameras around picking up every move, and lying would not be to his advantage, either with the public or the other housemates if it should get shown to the house. Until someone comes up with the evidence, I shall go with 'innocent till proven guilty'

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Well ignore his reasons then,it doesn't change the fact his job is done.

I still see it as a 'cop out'.....from someone who so wants to walk out of the house last...and knows he probably won't...it's a great comfort to him to make that statement.
It's just like how some or most people say " oh I'm so glad to be going" when they so obviously are not...

[erinp5]

Stephanie Davis’ knickers aren’t the most disgusting thing about Celebrity Big Brother
http://metro.co.uk/2016/01/24/stepha...other-5641533/

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by susie q

Wheres the evidence to support this statement? If theres video footage showing him doing it then you should have posted it in the thread. John may not be the nicest of housemates, but he is definitely not stupid. So why would he lie about not doing it, when he knows there are cameras around picking up every move, and lying would not be to his advantage, either with the public or the other housemates if it should get shown to the house. Until someone comes up with the evidence, I shall go with 'innocent till proven guilty'

On last nights show Steph told Tiff that John instigated it. The previous night on LF the full extent of the convo between Tiff and John was played out. Tiff told John that Steph had said he had instigated it and John blatantly said he didn't and wouldn't do that to a 20 year old girl. He denied it. He is a liar.
Try and retrieve the LF footage...

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by erinp5

Stephanie Davis’ knickers aren’t the most disgusting thing about Celebrity Big Brother
http://metro.co.uk/2016/01/24/stepha...other-5641533/

What a pathetic article.

Vaginal discharge might be normal but leaving your discharge filled knickers around the house for days isn't.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

On last nights show Steph told Tiff that John instigated it. The previous night on LF the full extent of the convo between Tiff and John was played out. Tiff told John that Steph had said he had instigated it and John blatantly said he didn't and wouldn't do that to a 20 year old girl. He denied it. He is a liar.
Try and retrieve the LF footage...

LOL,now c.mon these stories get more bizarre by the day,Steph said there was THREE of them,Darren,John and Chris,Tiffany said did they all put them there? Steph said No,Tiffany said so who do you think put them there ,Steph said Johnny and Tiffany said I think so too, but the thing is John never put the pants on the table,they were there with other washing,they were discovered when they were sorting the washing,thats when they noticed they were dirty.but its ok lets just blame John

[ThriceShy]

The woman who wrote that metro article is a fruitcake. She says:

It is baffling. It’s baffling that a woman has to pay for the luxury of needing tampons and sanitary towels. It’s baffling that if we don’t use these products and end up with menstrual blood on our clothes we are looked down upon.

What on earth is she talking about? She thinks sanitary towels should be free? Well can razors and shaving gel be free then because I spend a bloody fortune having to shave my face every day as a man. Perhaps bog roll should be free as that is a normal function too.

Who does she think should pay for her sanitary towels?

Feminism has gone mad.

[jet]

Originally Posted by susie q

Wheres the evidence to support this statement? If theres video footage showing him doing it then you should have posted it in the thread. John may not be the nicest of housemates, but he is definitely not stupid. So why would he lie about not doing it, when he knows there are cameras around picking up every move, and lying would not be to his advantage, either with the public or the other housemates if it should get shown to the house. Until someone comes up with the evidence, I shall go with 'innocent till proven guilty'

He told Tiff on the live feed that he 'would never humiliate a young girl' when she asked him about it, which was a lie as that is exactly what he had done. Others have also confirmed he said it on live feed. Maybe you haven't read those posts. He got a good edit because it was cut out of the h/ls.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

LOL,now c.mon these stories get more bizarre by the day,Steph said there was THREE of them,Darren,John and Chris,Tiffany said did they all put them there? Steph said No,Tiffany said so who do you think put them there ,Steph said Johnny and Tiffany said I think so too, but the thing is John never put the pants on the table,they were there with other washing,they were discovered when they were sorting the washing,thats when they noticed they were dirty.but its ok lets just blame John

I don't deny that...you are right. That's how the washing got onto the table. However it was John who said about the pigeon poop on the knickers and it was John who said "leave it there to name and shame"...then it was John that went into the bedroom and told Gemma Megan and Danielle.... I'm not making it up.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I don't deny that...you are right. That's how the washing got onto the table. However it was John who said about the pigeon poop on the knickers and it was John who said "leave it there to name and shame"...then it was John that went into the bedroom and told Gemma Megan and Danielle.... I'm not making it up.

Did you forget or see what Chris or Darren were doing/saying? probably not, as people tend to focus on John,and did you see John talking to Jeremy and Steph about it after?

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by susie q

Wheres the evidence to support this statement? If theres video footage showing him doing it then you should have posted it in the thread. John may not be the nicest of housemates, but he is definitely not stupid. So why would he lie about not doing it, when he knows there are cameras around picking up every move, and lying would not be to his advantage, either with the public or the other housemates if it should get shown to the house. Until someone comes up with the evidence, I shall go with 'innocent till proven guilty'

When John mentioned finding out who and/or naming and shaming the only person they knew they didn't belong to was Gemma for obvious reasons.
John did not know they were Stephs at the time he said the comment, and in my view, he or anyone else would have been fully right to say it and actually do it.
The person who left them for days for maybe others to come into contact with was filthy and disgusting.
Naming and shaming the culprit was the absolute very least they should have got done as to them,in my opinion.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Did you forget or see what Chris or Darren were doing/saying? probably not, as people tend to focus on John,and did you see John talking to Jeremy and Steph about it after?

In another thread I replied to you pointing out Darren and Christopher's miniscule role in knickergate.