About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Cherie · 02-02-2016, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

She does not qualify under the "fake boobs rule"

Yes, I know Josy is a member but we made an exception when she bought everyone marshmallows

Jamie89 · 02-02-2016, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

Yes I do get it that the programme is edited

Every other HM is judged on the edit so why not Tiffany

I'm not saying she can't be judged on it, my original comment was pointing out that it's not all she does and that it's just the occasional remark she's making, in response to a comment that was saying that it's "all she does" in the house.

Kazanne · 02-02-2016, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Not Kaz being drawn to the dark side (DS - see what I did there

) away from TiBB

I've been a member there for a few years Jamie,I don't like it as much as here,but it's nice to get different perpectives and as I said they seem to kinda like John,so it's nice to see

Northern Monkey · 02-02-2016, 12:55 PM

Editing has been awful for years.They pick a fav and that's it.Any contender gets made to look bad.No surprise really.I mean look what they did for Helen Wood in her final week.There was literally no possibility of her winning two weeks prior.I don't know why people expect any different.

RodHull · 02-02-2016, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Again though, it's not that that's all her conversations have focused on, it's what the edit has focused on. We're not watching a full day. If we were to total up how much time we've seen her talking about sexual things, it doesn't really add up to much in comparison to how much time she's actually spent in the house. Outside of the snippets we get shown of her, she's obviously going to be talking about other things, but those conversations aren't necessarily going to generate publicity for the show. Whereas sex talk is, as this forum proves

No housemate is ever going to be given an edit that accurately reflects their day. They show the bits that will get people talking.

You could say that about all of them, as viewers we have to judge them on their entertaining or controversial moments, Id imagine they all spend much of the day chatting random crap with each other. John isnt always being sanctimonious, gemma doesnt spend all day s**t stirring, Steph and Jeremy didnt spend all day discussing their relationship.

Point is BB have been giving her favourable edits since davids dead gate, shes always given tasks which are designed to bring out her 'fun' side, and I understand why there was the beginnings of a race row following megans ghetto remark so they basically bigged her up and have run with it since as shes a favourite now.

Bottom line in her best moments interacting with other HMs that we get to watch she does discuss sex a LOT more than anyone in there, which is fine I have no problem with that at all good luck to her, but for people to complain she somehow is subject to unfair editing is ridiculous.

If you want to be pedantic they all are

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

Editing has been awful for years.They pick a fav and that's it.Any contender gets made to look bad.No surprise really.I mean look what they did for Helen Wood in her final week.There was literally no possibility of her winning two weeks prior.I don't know why people expect any different.

There was every possibility, she remained joint fave with that irish thing from pretty much half way through. The small crowd and vocal super fans hated her, most others thought she was the best thing on the show that year.

Helen aside, Tiff has been given good edits for weeks, hell if they didnt show her chatting about sex while drunk shed basically not feature at all aside from her marathon moaning sessions about not fitting in.

Jamie89 · 02-02-2016, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RodHull

You could say that about all of them, as viewers we have to judge them on their entertaining or controversial moments, Id imagine they all spend much of the day chatting random crap with each other. John isnt always being sanctimonious, gemma doesnt spend all day s**t stirring, Steph and Jeremy didnt spend all day discussing their relationship.

Point is BB have been giving her favourable edits since davids dead gate, shes always given tasks which are designed to bring out her 'fun' side, and I understand why there was the beginnings of a race row following megans ghetto remark so they basically bigged her up and have run with it since as shes a favourite now.

Bottom line in her best moments interacting with other HMs that we get to watch she does discuss sex a LOT more than anyone in there, which is fine I have no problem with that at all good luck to her, but for people to complain she somehow is subject to unfair editing is ridiculous.

If you want to be pedantic they all are

I know they're all edited, I'm not trying to suggest otherwise. My original comment was in response to someone saying that it's "all she does", because obviously it isn't.

RodHull · 02-02-2016, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie89

I know they're all edited, I'm not trying to suggest otherwise. My original comment was in response to someone saying that it's "all she does", because obviously it isn't.

But I think he rather meant, thats all she does of interest. As in thats all thats deemed worthy of showing us.

Now if you want to discuss the merits of BBs production and editing thats a different thing but they are all judged on the same bad editing and bad production so taking that in mind yes that pretty much is all she does.

By contrast take someone like Darren hes seen being weak sometimes, flawed, sometimes funny, sometimes caring etc etc He has a varied range of interactions with different HMs, Tiff just basically huffs around or has slightly insincere chats with people and then gets drunk and goes on about her ladybits,

wendywillow · 02-02-2016, 01:47 PM

I don't think tiff has been that scandalous, girl needs to get off, cbb not doing her any favors knowing the prudes that watch will be clutching their pearls in response but it doesn't matter really, its final weel

susie q · 02-02-2016, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne

It's the same with them all I think,I have been reading some posts on DS as John seems quite liked there and they were saying that john has had some great video moments that have never made it to the highlights so I think there is a lot they leave out.

Its the same with Darren, it seems like hes been having more fun than the highlights show. They seem to think that we all want showmances, sleaze, bitching. Dont get me wrong I dont mind any of those, But would like to see more fun though 50/50 has always worked for me.

Cherie · 02-02-2016, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RodHull

You could say that about all of them, as viewers we have to judge them on their entertaining or controversial moments, Id imagine they all spend much of the day chatting random crap with each other. John isnt always being sanctimonious, gemma doesnt spend all day s**t stirring, Steph and Jeremy didnt spend all day discussing their relationship.

Point is BB have been giving her favourable edits since davids dead gate, shes always given tasks which are designed to bring out her 'fun' side, and I understand why there was the beginnings of a race row following megans ghetto remark so they basically bigged her up and have run with it since as shes a favourite now.

Bottom line in her best moments interacting with other HMs that we get to watch she does discuss sex a LOT more than anyone in there, which is fine I have no problem with that at all good luck to her, but for people to complain she somehow is subject to unfair editing is ridiculous.

If you want to be pedantic they all are

There was every possibility, she remained joint fave with that irish thing from pretty much half way through. The small crowd and vocal super fans hated her, most others thought she was the best thing on the show that year.

Helen aside, Tiff has been given good edits for weeks, hell if they didnt show her chatting about sex while drunk shed basically not feature at all aside from her marathon moaning sessions about not fitting in.

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie89

I know they're all edited, I'm not trying to suggest otherwise. My original comment was in response to someone saying that it's "all she does", because obviously it isn't.

And mine was in response to the OP who said she was "suddenly being edited like this" Because it's not sudden at all

Patricia4 · 02-02-2016, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I think the British audience as frankly sick fed up of her unladylike disgusting thirst

she is imploding as we watch

no wonder she is 34 and a spinster

chuff me dizzy · 02-02-2016, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I think the British audience as frankly sick fed up of her unladylike disgusting thirst

she is imploding as we watch

no wonder she is 34 and a spinster

aj2463 · 02-02-2016, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I think the British audience as frankly sick fed up of her unladylike disgusting thirst

she is imploding as we watch

no wonder she is 34 and a spinster

Oh how 50's of you

so if you ain't married or want to be married by the age of 34, that's a bad thing? Hahaa

Crimson Dynamo · 02-02-2016, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aj2463

Oh how 50's of you

so if you ain't married or want to be married by the age of 34, that's a bad thing? Hahaa

not bad but its a fairly good indicator....

aj2463 · 02-02-2016, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

not bad but its a fairly good indicator....

Rather small minded.. But it's your opinion

alex_front2 · 02-02-2016, 05:31 PM

Yes she's easily the best hm (any open minded person can see this) but she wont win. Nothing new here.

rionablue · 02-02-2016, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iRyan

Why do they insist on mostly showing her only talk about sex all of the sudden? As if she's not talking about anything else or doing anything else entertaining....give me a break. They don't want an "unknown" American winner because someone like Scotty T, Gemma, Darren, or Danniella winning would give them better publicity. And that's the truth tea.

TIFFANY is sabotaging the Tiffany win. Nobody can MAKE her speak or act like that.

Withano · 02-02-2016, 05:39 PM

i dont think the producers can be blamed for tiffs thirstiness

Kazanne · 02-02-2016, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alex_front2

Yes she's easily the best hm (any open minded person can see this) but she wont win. Nothing new here.

Well I'm open minded and I think she has been a bit of a let down

sampvt · 02-02-2016, 06:01 PM

I cant see the attraction some fans of hers have. She is a proven sexual predator and a blatant game player, but when you strip all this back, she suffers from self loathing and has morphed her body into a shape that is borderline sluttish. She isn't that intelligent and openly admits she makes a living out of being a biach. I guess some people need a hero figure to look up to but \I for one just see her as an outright bitch with no redeeming qualities at all.

chuff me dizzy · 02-02-2016, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rionablue

TIFFANY is sabotaging the Tiffany win. Nobody can MAKE her speak or act like that.

She's not in the USA ,the English as a race hate arrogant people who declare themselves the winner

chuff me dizzy · 02-02-2016, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt

I cant see the attraction some fans of hers have. She is a proven sexual predator and a blatant game player, but when you strip all this back, she suffers from self loathing and has morphed her body into a shape that is borderline sluttish. She isn't that intelligent and openly admits she makes a living out of being a biach. I guess some people need a hero figure to look up to but \I for one just see her as an outright bitch with no redeeming qualities at all.