Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew.
If Avery is as disturbed as he's been made out to be i wouldn't have thought a bullet to the head would be his type of style.. it's the easy/quick way to settle things. I guess if she was held alive for quite a while and Avery had got his pleasure from doing whatever he was doing & then wanted to get rid of her as quickly as possible then it could be considered.. but having her held alive for a long time would have been noticeable within the group of family members that live there.
It's just another situation where it looks more likely that someone else did do it or that shooting her in the head was the best and quickest option to kill her off if he was being set up by someone else..
|
...but then I keep coming back to 'most murders/murderers' are either someone close to the victim or the last person to be known to see her alive..?..and we have some possible suspects, on the Avery property or her brother or ex..?..and then we go into all of the 'conspiracies' and 'theories' with them and the things that could be seen to be shady etc...but the 'obvious' would be that Steven did kill her, it's the most logical in a way because her charred bones and her car were there and he was the last person to see her...and if it hadn't been for his 18yr wrongful conviction, would we all not be thinking that...but that's complicated it obviously because he's professed innocence again...and I do think that the police dept did illegally find her car on the property when they shouldn't have been there, so obviously there has been some covering up there, making it all look 'corrupt' and 'framed'..and they obviously manipulated some evidence as well, to try to place her in Steven's van and ensure his conviction...that's just Steven obviously, not Brendon...