[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Exactly, Cherie,whatever happened to that child started with sheer neglect from her parents.

Kaz don't fall for that lie, neglect is McCanns alibi,without claiming they neglected the children they couldn't claim Maddie had been abducted,Every night of the holiday one adult was "ill" so this person was the babysitter, the twins were not even in 5a on the 3rd May,the night the alibi was made ....Maddie died days before we even knew her name

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Kaz don't fall for that lie, neglect is McCanns alibi,without claiming they neglected the children they couldn't claim Maddie had been abducted,Every night of the holiday one adult was "ill" so this person was the babysitter, the twins were not even in 5a on the 3rd May,the night the alibi was made ....Maddie died days before we even knew her name

Is there any evidence for that theory?

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Is there any evidence for that theory?

I'm going to jump in here and say definitively: NO.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Is there any evidence for that theory?

Have you watched the videos i posted? if you had and had dug deep into the case,you will find plenty of evidence to back my claim ,don't accept.....search

[Livia]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Have you watched the videos i posted? if you had and had dug deep into the case,you will find plenty of evidence to back my claim ,don't accept.....search

You are a loss to the legal profession.

Or.... not.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

You are a loss to the legal profession.

Or.... not.

The "legal profession " you wish you were in Miss Marples ?

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Have you watched the videos i posted? if you had and had dug deep into the case,you will find plenty of evidence to back my claim ,don't accept.....search

4 hours of unfounded conspiracy theories? No I haven't. I'm sure they're entertaining but looking at the facts of the case objectively, without them being presented with an agenda, there isn't any actual evidence of what you're suggesting. Suspicions are one thing but suspicious behavior does not equal child murderer.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Jamie89

4 hours of unfounded conspiracy theories? No I haven't. I'm sure they're entertaining but looking at the facts of the case objectively, without them being presented with an agenda, there isn't any actual evidence of what you're suggesting. Suspicions are one thing but suspicious behavior does not equal child murderer.

Believe what you want to believe, Im past caring to be honest

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Believe what you want to believe, Im past caring to be honest

It's not a case of me believing any particular theory, for all I know they might be guilty (although personally I think it's very unlikely). What I'm saying is that noone can be certain either way because there simply isn't the evidence. Just a bunch of stuff that looks kinda dodgy and I don't think that's enough to condemn someone as a child murderer.

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Know what I do find sort of telling? No one has any problem whatsoever with speculation surrounding the Stephen Avery "Making a Murderer" stuff, documentaries about it, countless theories, it's all sort of accepted as being fine to have opinions and theories...

...but try to suggest an alternate theory in the Maddie case, or suggest that any of the surrounding events aren't whiter-than-white and above board and could have happened to anyone and oh it's fine to all leave your kids alone, at night, in unlocked apartments, in a foreign country... and you get shot down from all angles. Because Middle Class British Folks! How dare you suggest they are anything other than exemplary parents. You must simply believe the also entirely assumed / guesswork narrative that Maddie was abducted. There is ZERO EVIDENCE that she was abducted by a paedophile. The evidence is that she was left alone in a room, and that she silently disappeared from that room while her siblings were left asleep and unharmed. That's it. That's the whole story, as far as 100% verified evidence goes.

But it's fine to theorise that she was abducted by MI5 trained stealth Gypsy paedophiles... just don't dare theorise that anyone else had anything to do with it

There's nothing wrong with theorising if that's all it is, and if people are aware that their theories are simply that. It can become dangerous when people start to believe their theories and go on to perpetuate them as fact, when the result is someone being labeled a child killer.