| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Big Brother Canada Big Brother Canada 9 started 3th March 2021. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#604 | |||
|
||||
|
♡☯♡☮♡☯♡☮♡
|
A Howl at Cass and Jared arguing also and Nikki shutting Dallas up
Today was feeds gold in case anyone has withdrawal!
__________________
![]() ![]() Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#605 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
If the house has to choose who comes back, then they will choose Kelsey. Bummer
![]() I so wanted Loveita back in the game. |
||
|
|
|
|
#606 | |||
|
||||
|
Mode: Broken
|
It´s the producers. They want Kelsey back to continue her showmance with Jared. And they are letting the house decide cause they know that they will pick Kelsey, cause she is lesser threat and more stoic in her decisions, whereas Loveita is a complete wildcard.
They also know that had Canada decided Loveita would probably have been voted back and if it was a competition Loveita would have had some sort of edge too. Last edited by Calderyon; 01-04-2016 at 09:56 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#609 | |||
|
||||
|
Lisa Scott-Lee Expert
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#610 | |||
|
||||
|
.
|
Quote:
![]() I actually think the fact that they've said the decision must be unanimous is an interesting thing to consider though. Why must it be unanimous? It strikes me as an odd thing to stipulate and it also suggests that something might happen if they fail to vote unanimously. I can't help but suspect that the producers secretly want both of them back in, and maybe if the housemates fail to vote for one of them unanimously, the repercussion is that both of them return?
__________________
![]() BBCAN: Erica | Will | Veronica | Johnny | Alejandra | Ryan | Paras |
|||
|
|
|
|
#611 | |||
|
||||
|
Mode: Broken
|
Well why else would the producers use airtime to highlight showmances like Ramsey/Maddy and Jared/Kelsey etc.
I might be wrong, but what gather is that BB producers have always had some kind of odd fixation towards showmances cause they somehow think that the viewers like and want to see them, when i´m not sure if that´s the case anymore. It might have been at some point, but nto now. Not fake and fabricated ones at least like they mostly are nowadays. People still like relationships and romances that are genuine though. If i were in some of the housemates shoes, i would think, which one of the two already has an alliance ready to protect her should she enter and which one of them is disliked in the house and is basically all alone in the game. If i was Joe, i would never agree to bring Kelsey back, since it would make his HOH void. I would at least force a non-animous decision to see what happens then. Last edited by Calderyon; 01-04-2016 at 10:15 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#613 | |||
|
||||
|
Too glam to give a damn
|
The brothers are over Nikki. Nick said she was a waste of space, and Phil said no one would care if she went.
The ****ers. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#614 | |||
|
||||
|
Too glam to give a damn
|
that was a bit much, but the arse licking towards Kelsey is annoying.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#619 | |||
|
||||
|
Too glam to give a damn
|
Joel won POV apparently?
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#622 | |||
|
||||
|
Too glam to give a damn
|
Cassandra has a nerve to say that Loveita was a bully.
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|