[Jack_]

Ahh TiBB, where points are continuously missed and people's posts aren't bothered to be read and understood properly!

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Because the section explaining it is about a cultural etiquette, it's not just religious people who do those kinds of things.

Exactly. So again, why include the names of two religions in the subtitle of that section?

Originally Posted by Marsh.

And I can only assume someone who thinks every single story has no truth to it automatically because of a paper's political leanings is being wilfully stupid.

Eh? Please direct me to the point in this thread where I've made any suggestion that this story isn't true? In actual fact I made two posts stating very clearly that this story is disgusting, the man should be prosecuted and that in pointing out what the Mail is using this story for, I'm not trying to absolve him of anything.

So where have I insinuated this story isn't true?

Originally Posted by Cherie

Where do you get off? I wasn't partaking in your angle on the discussion, which seems to be Mail, Mail, rant rant nothing new there so nothing to discuss as it's said on every thread with a Mail link. You decided to drag me into your discussion by quoting my post and telling me (and Kaz) that we had missed your point. No I didn't I just didn't acknowledge your point, now you are telling me I shouldn't be commenting at all because I didn't read the article in full, anything else I can do to make your stay more comfortable?

Err...yes you were:

Originally Posted by Cherie

As usual this has turned into a "which is better" debate

I didn't drag you into anything, you decided to drag yourself into a discussion I was having with Vicky in a post that was quite obviously directed at me (although conveniently not quoted), so I responded.

You then said, and I quote, 'what the Mail is doing is neither here nor there', thereby entering yourself into the discussion regarding the article's intentions - so yes you did acknowledge my point, and really, partaking in a discussion about an article when you've not read said article is, well...uh...pointless?

[Ninastar]

Nah I understand your point completely. The daily mail is a pile of **** and I think the only fan of the DM on here is LT. But the fact that you're more bothered about the article than the fact that this person could have made some people really sick, says it all really.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Ninastar

Nah I understand your point completely. The daily mail is a pile of **** and I think the only fan of the DM on here is LT. But the fact that you're more bothered about the article than the fact that this person could have made some people really sick, says it all really.

Again, where the **** have I said I'm not bothered about the actions of this man? Said it's anything other than disgusting? Said that he shouldn't be prosecuted? People clearly don't bother reading threads because I've said the opposite of these things on several occasions highlighting how stories of this ilk are used to further the agenda of a national newspaper does not absolve anyone of anything, but is still important - especially when people start reciting the same messages in their posts

(as a side note, there are far more people than just LT on here that don't know or don't care what the Mail's about)

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Again, where the **** have I said I'm not bothered about the actions of this man? Said it's anything other than disgusting? Said that he shouldn't be prosecuted? People clearly don't bother reading threads because I've said the opposite of these things on several occasions highlighting how stories of this ilk are used to further the agenda of a national newspaper does not absolve anyone of anything, but is still important - especially when people start reciting the same messages in their posts

(as a side note, there are far more people than just LT on here that don't know or don't care what the Mail's about)

I agree with everything you have said. This article is a good representative sample of the Daily Mail. Welcome to the modern Britain. Like a new soap powder - it washes whiter than white..

All I can say is, you can't keep addressing peoples objections when those objections are not only disregarded but dismantled. If people are personally offended by your confidence, then be content with that.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Ahh TiBB, where points are continuously missed and people's posts aren't bothered to be read and understood properly!



Exactly. So again, why include the names of two religions in the subtitle of that section?



Eh? Please direct me to the point in this thread where I've made any suggestion that this story isn't true? In actual fact I made two posts stating very clearly that this story is disgusting, the man should be prosecuted and that in pointing out what the Mail is using this story for, I'm not trying to absolve him of anything.

So where have I insinuated this story isn't true?



Err...yes you were:



I didn't drag you into anything, you decided to drag yourself into a discussion I was having with Vicky in a post that was quite obviously directed at me (although conveniently not quoted), so I responded.

You then said, and I quote, 'what the Mail is doing is neither here nor there', thereby entering yourself into the discussion regarding the article's intentions - so yes you did acknowledge my point, and really, partaking in a discussion about an article when you've not read said article is, well...uh...pointless?

Conveniently not quoted!, because I wasn't addressing your point, hard for you to digest I know. You have an over inflated sense of your own importance, most of the time I don't read your posts

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Ninastar

Nah I understand your point completely. The daily mail is a pile of **** and I think the only fan of the DM on here is LT. But the fact that you're more bothered about the article than the fact that this person could have made some people really sick, says it all really.

[Greg!]

Welp how does a thread about someone wiping their arse with their bare hands have huge massive paragraphs of debate

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

I agree with everything you have said. This article is a good representative sample of the Daily Mail. Welcome to the modern Britain. Like a new soap powder - it washes whiter than white..

All I can say is, you can't keep addressing peoples objections when those objections are not only disregarded but dismantled. If people are personally offended by your confidence, then be content with that.

Don't worry, I'm often in the minority on here but it doesn't and won't stop me pointing out and standing up for what's right. Thank you though, I'm glad someone agrees and I really appreciate you saying that

Originally Posted by Cherie

Conveniently not quoted!, because I wasn't addressing your point, hard for you to digest I know. You have an over inflated sense of your own importance, most of the time I don't read your posts

So do pray tell, what you were referring to when you said 'as usual this has turned into a "which is better" debate'? Because from the looks of things there wasn't any other discussion going on.

That's quite hilarious coming from you but sure that makes two of us then, I tend to only read yours when you've quoted me...if only you'd have the decency to do the same before you do eh?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

It really feels like we are on a mission today.

Muslims and Hindus and a lot of Italians don't use toilet paper but either have a water hose next to the toilet or take a bottle of water into the toilet with them.

The fact that they found this water bottle in the kitchen is not on and I agree, this guy needs prosecuting but in general, the water system as opposed to the toilet paper system is both environmentally and hygienically better when its used properly.

There you go Jack. Maybe you should read the thread, this is the post that prompted my comment

[Kazanne]

Bottom line is,he is a dirty, unclean bastard whatever culture ,creed or religion he is or follows !!!!

[Crimson Dynamo]

I only look at the DM for the celeb bikini shots

#letLTlive

[Denver]

What a load of ****

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Bottom line is,he is a dirty, unclean bastard whatever culture ,creed or religion he is or follows !!!!

Indeed, hope he is banned from owning or working in kitchens for life if he thinks this behaviour is okay.

[Kizzy]

Cultural or not it's a grim practice :/

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I only look at the DM for the celeb bikini shots

#letLTlive