[Jack_]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

IMO your thinking is way out and as Ive said over and over I do not condone violence of any kind

This is not my thinking though, this is evidence from the Office for National Statistics. I haven't made it up

I'm not disputing that, but you have said you don't think any woman is a match for a man. How is that possible if men are also domestic violence victims?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Jack_

This is not my thinking though, this is evidence from the Office for National Statistics. I haven't made it up

I'm not disputing that, but you have said you don't think any woman is a match for a man. How is that possible if men are also domestic violence victims?

and of that 40% how does the violence and injury compare?

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

and of that 40% how does the violence and injury compare?

So domestic violence is a competition now? We have to compare the damage from victim to victim? You have to pass a certain 'abused' threshold for it to be considered a problem?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Jack_

So domestic violence is a competition now? We have to compare the damage from victim to victim? You have to pass a certain 'abused' threshold for it to be considered a problem?

Can we please get back on topic

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Jack_

So domestic violence is a competition now? We have to compare the damage from victim to victim? You have to pass a certain 'abused' threshold for it to be considered a problem?

well if women are getting beaten senseless and disfigured and men are getting the odd pan thrown at them I would say yes

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

well if women are getting beaten senseless and disfigured and men are getting the odd pan thrown at them I would say yes

I'm just gonna assume (and hope) this is one of your trademark bad taste jokes.