Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_
No, because the public are the entire problem! As I keep saying, to succeed on BBUK you basically need to: be fortunate enough to have a penis, have the added bonus of being attractive, befriend all of your housemates and be the 'nice guy' so you're never nominated, say and do nothing the entire summer so you float your way to the final - and then you're almost destined to win.
It's counterproductive nonsense that requires no skill and no merit whatsoever, and thus you can barely say that half of the winners 'deserved' it
Winning over a jury of your peers however - now that takes some doing, and is a far fairer method of determining a winner.
|
But people can and have made the same arguments about the wrong people winning BBUS because of bitter juries and whatnot. Danielle Reyes was robbed, Maggie and Ivette are both awful, Jordan did nothing, Dan Gheesling was screwed because the jury agreed to never vote for him, blah blah blah. Half of the winners are considered garbage because they didn't play The Best Game so it's not like the end result is automatically going to improve just because there's no public vote.
Alex,
Threaded Mode