[delta]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I agree.

However for me BB is about us looking in on people with their good sides and bad sides, then the people they live with deciding to put them up for eviction and those who have offended or we don;t like getting voted out.

Why can't BB be used to expose prejudices people have, get them out in the open, rather than have them acting most or all of the time guarding what they say.

Of course BB has to set them challenges, make sure they are safe and take action against any actual physical aggression.
However let them show themselves up as to what and how they think,as if we were looking in on their own houses.

BB has always been a controversial idea as to its original planning.
We are warned at the start of every programme of offence probably being caused across the board as to just about everything.

If we are so easily offended then why watch it in the first place.

I'd actually rather know how people really think and feel and also their prejudices, rather than see people acting falsely to try to win a programme.
Leaving us thinking they are possibly all sweetness and decent when in reality they and indeed I and others too, all likely have flaws and views that will surely offend someone,it is near impossible for that not to be the case.

I agree but it just wouldn't work. They would be off air faster than you could say Bear.

What I don't agree with is the one sided judication that has taken place, I haven't got time for Biggins, he's a slob of a man, with very poor acting skills and been a C rated actor all of his life, but for fairness Renee should have gone as well or they both should have been given a final warning.

It's difficult to judge properly what has taken place and to be able to comment on it with any degree of certainty,all we can do is second guess. The facts that we do know is that Biggins was booted out, now if it had been a lone oration where he was preaching to the house and they were all looking on flaberghasted then Biggins could have very little reason to being bewildered for his dismissal. As it happened it was a two way conversation where both housemates expressed the same views and for that both should have been dealt the same punishment,what ever they deemed fit.

My personal opinion it was way over the top removing him from the house and smacks of double standards. Aubrey's spitting in Bear's food and drink was a far worse infraction and deserved instand dismissal.