[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Anyone with half a brain cell could have predicted this being so.

Just as, if we HAD have taken ALL those Calais Camp 5,000, 6,000 or 10,000 (however many) NON refugees, that would have sent the message back to the other 34 million (or whatever) would-be Economic Migrants worldwide, that: "Hey - It works boy." and Calais would soon be one humongous camp.

They ALL are already clued up that:

a) Once in the UK illegally, it is IMPOSSIBLE to remove them.
b) If they are apprehended in the UK by Border Force, they CANNOT do ANYTHING to them if the illegals have no documents and passports.
c) For the VAST majority of apprehended illegals, they ARE released into HOTELS and GUEST HOUSES paid for by the UK TAXPAYER, pending 'ENQUIRIES' - from which 99% of them disappear without trace.

The government keeps NO RECORDS of just how many ILLEGALS are actual in the UK, and there could be as many as 10 MILLION for all we know.

NO, I AM NOT REFERRING TO GENUINE REFUGEES OR GENUINE CHILDREN HERE, FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY DECIPHERING WHAT I AM WRITING.

Got any proof for these claims?

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Got any proof for these claims?

watching ALL the Border Force and other documentaries screened on Terrestrial and Sky channels for years, reading ALL the relevant articles in diverse publications, and reading dozens of internet articles from diverse sources.

None of the above are of any use at all however, without an open mind and a willingness to accept truth and reality.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

watching ALL the Border Force and other documentaries screened on Terrestrial and Sky channels for years, reading ALL the relevant articles in diverse publications, and reading dozens of internet articles from diverse sources.

None of the above are of any use at all however, without an open mind and a willingness to accept truth and reality.

Oh come on now, I said have you any proof and you give me media propaganda?
I'm done.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Oh come on now, I said have you any proof and you give me media propaganda?
I'm done.

I'm afraid that the are on YOU, because this is particularly 'rich' coming from a member whose greatest trait is copy pasta and posting links to media articles. YOUR GUARDIAN LINK just 2 posts above being a classic example

Perhaps, you would identify just where you derive your information from - other than the sources which I have just detailed in my own post - because it is quite obvious that it is NOT from your own direct personal experience.

Would you PLEASE enlighten us all?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

I'm afraid that the are on YOU, because this is particularly 'rich' coming from a member whose greatest trait is copy pasta and posting links to media articles. YOUR GUARDIAN LINK just 2 posts above being a classic example

Perhaps, you would identify just where you derive your information from - other than the sources which I have just detailed in my own post - because it is quite obvious that it is NOT from your own direct personal experience.

Would you PLEASE enlighten us all?

That Guardian link is at least news such as it is, not a light entertainment show on morning television :/

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

That Guardian link is at least news such as it is, not a light entertainment show on morning television :/

You quite obviously do not ever watch quality documentaries on any of the terrestrial or on the very many Sky Channels, if you are under the delusion that ANY of them are light entertainment shows OR that they are screened as part of 'Morning Television' - which would partly explain why your views on a whole plethora of Serious subjects give the impression of great naivety, denial, and having been formed by someone who lives life within very, very, narrow parameters.

And in light of the fact that you decried ALL the sources of MY information, could you PLEASE - for once - answer the question I posed to you?

I have repeated it below for your convenience:

Perhaps, you would identify just where you derive your information from - other than the sources which I have just detailed in my own post - because it is quite obvious that it is NOT from your own direct personal experience.

Would you PLEASE enlighten us all?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

[/B]

You quite obviously do not ever watch quality documentaries on any of the terrestrial or on the very many Sky Channels, if you are under the delusion that ANY of them are light entertainment shows OR that they are screened as part of 'Morning Television' - which would partly explain why your views on a whole plethora of Serious subjects give the impression of great naivety, denial, and having been formed by someone who lives life within very, very, narrow parameters.

And in light of the fact that you decried ALL the sources of MY information, could you PLEASE - for once - answer the question I posed to you?

I have repeated it below for your convenience:

Perhaps, you would identify just where you derive your information from - other than the sources which I have just detailed in my own post - because it is quite obvious that it is NOT from your own direct personal experience.

Would you PLEASE enlighten us all?

I haven't professed to holding 'facts' on this topic have I?

And I'm sorry but I still don't view 'Border force' as an accurate depiction or anything we could glean any credible, factual or statistical evidence from.