[Tom4784]

A week in and he's already flailing, I think my prediction of him only lasting a year is an overestimation.

[Kizzy]

Was this planned, I thought that decisions had to go via congress like our parliament... He just seems to be changing laws, amending conventional responsibilities, and removing rights with a tweet!
Surely it's all designed to oust him from the inside?... * crosses fingers *

[Jack_]

I don't know whether we should be longing for his impeachment, the alternative really isn't much better at all. We have four years of this divisive nonsense, and it'll be eight if the Democrats don't get their act together.

[Kizzy]

Come on Mr Sanders! ... (no not the KFC guy)

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I don't know whether we should be longing for his impeachment, the alternative really isn't much better at all. We have four years of this divisive nonsense, and it'll be eight if the Democrats don't get their act together.

I thought this at first but I'm beginning to change my mind. In my opinion any alternative is much more likey to at least toe the line. Trump is thus far looking completely ****ing unstable.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I see the sore losers are not resorting to name calling


how fckg predictable

did not take long

[MB.]

Yes, that's the real problem here, name calling xo

[Withano]

[MB.]

Not to mention that more Americans are killed in lightning strikes than domestic terrorist attacks, which I'm sure would lead Trump to try and ban all weather

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

I wonder if you would be so blase about that if one of those fatalities had been someone close to you.. Always different when it is faceless strangers hey...

The more people we let in the more extremists we will get and your chart will change considerably.

[Jack_]

Will it now?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Will it now?

And!

So if you are unlucky enough to have a loved one of yours killed by an Islamic terrorist we will console you with meaningless remarks such as poor them only a small number of people get killed by islamic terrorists - would that give you some peace?

Besides that figure will increase big time with the amount of immigrants coming to the West. - it is inevitable.

Lol at the armed toddlers.

[Crimson Dynamo]

i see its turned into a death pissing contest courtesy of twitter


how lovely

[rk3388]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

And!

So if you are unlucky enough to have a loved one of yours killed by an Islamic terrorist we will console you with meaningless remarks such as poor them only a small number of people get killed by islamic terrorists - would that give you some peace?

Besides that figure will increase big time with the amount of immigrants coming to the West. - it is inevitable.

Lol at the armed toddlers.

Please be careful when saying things such as "lol at the armed toddlers".

I have my Fire Arms license and in training we learn it is common for kids to find hidden guns and accidentally shoot their loved ones not knowing better- not a laughing matter at all.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by rk3388

Please be careful when saying things such as "lol at the armed toddlers".

I have my Fire Arms license and in training we learn it is common for kids to find hidden guns and accidentally shoot their loved ones not knowing better- not a laughing matter at all.

Of course it isn't, but seeing it on that chart like that seemed funny at the time but I see your point.

[Brillopad]

[QUOTE=Jack_;9188712]Will it now?

[/QUOTE

Doesn't 9/11 count? What about the next 9/11?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I wonder if you would be so blase about that if one of those fatalities had been someone close to you.. Always different when it is faceless strangers hey...

The more people we let in the more extremists we will get and your chart will change considerably.

Right.. But if you had a better conceptual understanding of graphs, you could see for yourself that extermists are not the problem, as far as America goes, theyre barely a problem. Maybe take another look, Jack posted a clearer one which may help you understand how dumb Trumps team and those who agree with them are being.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Lol at the armed toddlers.

Would you be so blasé if it was somebody you loved instead if a couple hundred faceless strangers?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

Right.. But if you had a better conceptual understanding of graphs, you could see for yourself that extermists are not the problem, as far as America goes, theyre barely a problem. Maybe take another look, Jack posted a clearer one which may help you understand how dumb Trumps team and those who agree with them are being.

But there is no denying that will change with considerably more immigrants coming in to the USA unless of course Trump's ban works,

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

Would you be so blasé if it was somebody you loved instead if a couple hundred faceless strangers?

Definitely not.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

But there is no denying that will change with considerably more immigrants coming in to the USA unless of course Trump's ban works,

What are your current thoughts on this ban inspiring more attacks...
At the moment, less Americans are killed by extremists than they are toddlers.. How would you react if this was to change as a direct retaliation of the ban?

Wouldnt it be awful if the graph no longer looked the way it does in 4 years time due to Trump and his supporters paranoia

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

What are your current thoughts on this ban inspiring more attacks...
At the moment, less Americans are killed by extremists than they are toddlers.. How would you react if this was to change as a direct retaliation of the ban?

Wouldnt it be awful if the graph no longer looked the way it does in 4 years time due to Trump and his supporters paranoia

Lots of ifs and buts, but do you want the West to be held to ransom like that - too scared to act for fear of reprisals - that plays right into the terrorists hands. They thrive on creating fear and we cannot play their game and be intimidated by them.

They will continue to commit terrorist acts until they get their way and create an Islamic West and unless you are prepared to give in to that you have to accept it is going to continue wall or no wall. To minimise the effects we have to make it harder for those from the outside to get in.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Lots of ifs and buts, but do you want the West to be held to ransom like that - too scared to act for fear of reprisals - that plays right into the terrorists hands. They thrive on creating fear and we cannot play their game and be intimidated by them.

They will continue to commit terrorist acts until they get their way and create an Islamic West and unless you are prepared to give in to that you have to accept it is going to continue wall or no wall. To minimise the effects we have to make it harder for those from the outside to get in.

But acting on fear is precisely what you are suggesting. I dont think you're thinking this through enough to warrant any more replies for me.

[Brillopad]

I did a simple check on google and found an article that was actually against Trump's ban and stated that 123 Americans have been killed in America by Islamic terrorists since 9/11, which works out about 20 something per year, considerably more than 2. God knows what others will say so think we need to take your little graph with a pinch of salt.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

But acting on fear is precisely what you are suggesting. I dont think you're thinking this through enough to warrant any more replies for me.

No loss!