[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Ok I amended the question.

It would be impossible to men in black stylee erase an attack, except the bowling green massacre obv...

'what direct terrorist incident from extremist Muslims has the US experienced on American soil?'

And you know that is why the Executive order was signed how?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

And you know that is why the Executive order was signed how?

I don't... I'm asking what is the justification for an executive order.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I don't... I'm asking what is the justification for an executive order.

I'm genuinely surprised to see there is none so far. I saw this thread earlier and assumed it would be debated for days, but there is little rational input from the other side up to now

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Withano

I'm genuinely surprised to see there is none so far. I saw this thread earlier and assumed it would be debated for days, but there is little rational input from the other side up to now

because no one on Tibb has security clearance for US intelligence

thankfully a vet USA soldier has at least shone a mirror at Iraq for us all.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

because no one on Tibb has security clearance for US intelligence

thankfully a vet USA soldier has at least shone a mirror at Iraq for us all.

Are you suggesting that hundreds of American people lost family members to extremists and it was ignored by all media?

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Withano

Are you suggesting that hundreds of American people lost family members to extremists and it was ignored by all media?

i am not, what i said was pretty clear tbh

[Withano]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

i am not, what i said was pretty clear tbh

So in summary; no evidence in support for the executive order. Interesting. Are you in favour of it?

[Cherry Christmas]

I don't particularly see a need for it, The USA has a pretty good vetting system before you go not to mention the grilling you get when you arrive, unless you exit via Dublin/Shannon where you get the grilling before you leave the country, I think Trump just wants to be seen to be honouring his election pledges, I don't know why he is going against the judges though

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I don't particularly see a need for it, The USA has a pretty good vetting system before you go not to mention the grilling you get when you arrive, unless you exit via Dublin/Shannon where you get the grilling before you leave the country, I think Trump just wants to be seen to be honouring his election pledges, I don't know why he is going against the judges though

I agree with all of this. Id like to add that hes an old-fashioned man-child

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I don't particularly see a need for it, The USA has a pretty good vetting system before you go not to mention the grilling you get when you arrive, unless you exit via Dublin/Shannon where you get the grilling before you leave the country, I think Trump just wants to be seen to be honouring his election pledges, I don't know why he is going against the judges though

We were there in Oct/Nov and we got zero grilling, I was surprised

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

We were there in Oct/Nov and we got zero grilling, I was surprised

See? It clearly doesn't work. They detain totally innocent people from the Middle East but they let the likes of Niamh in without question? Broken system.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

thankfully a vet USA soldier has at least shone a mirror at Iraq for us all.

An ex-soldier turned PMC merc. Stop it with the alternative facts LT.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

An ex-soldier turned PMC merc. Stop it with the alternative facts LT.

and stop trying to obfuscate with detail that is irrelevant to the issue

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

and stop trying to obfuscate with detail that is irrelevant to the issue

It's not irrelevant at all or you wouldn't keep doing it; you're trying to inflate the impact of his statement by making him out to be a patriot / military man fighting for his country because you know fine well that the opinions of a private military gun-for-hire who is in Iraq for cold hard cash (also known as, a mercenary) is slightly shakier ground. If you thought otherwise, you wouldn't keep referring to him as a soldier.