Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie89
I'd be interested to read it, I'm still fascinated by the election. On the Russia thing though, in the snippet it says that she lost not because of Russia but because of voters turning to Trump... but weren't Russia accused of an 'influence campaign'? Therefore some of the voters that turned to Trump could have turned because of the Russian involvement? So it's ignoring some basic logic there and makes me wonder if the book is biased/propaganda? Not that I think she lost solely because of Russia, personally I think there were likely a lot of factors that led to her defeat, problems with her campaign, problems with her as a candidate, but also Trump tapping in to a lot of peoples fears, and yeah maybe partly the Russian involvement too.
|
In my understanding the Russian claims have not been proven. I just find it interesting that Clinton started and planned such allegations - she is one sore loser who cannot accept she was not as popular as she liked to think she was and has no scruples or morals whatsoever.
Threaded Mode