| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Well Jesus Christ, I think we will hopefully know we are going to be attacked before we actually get nuked and nuke the idiots before we fry.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Doesn't work that way I'm afraid. They launch, we launch or we lauch, they launch. There is no "one sided" nuclear strike. If we are attacked with nuclear weapons, or ever fire a nuclear weapon, your best and only hope is to be within the immediate blast radius of one of the first few bombs so that your death is as quick and painless as possible. This is the reality of Nuclear weapons and Nuclear warfare. The sooner people get their heads around that, the better.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
However knowing that we will press the button if we have to instead of just sitting like a pan of fishfingers waiting to fry would help. Saying he would not be happy with drones picking off terrorist leaders doesn't help either. The fact that the labour spokesman had to come out and explain that his views are not labour policy is quite telling. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
cancelled
|
Quote:
i believe russia usa uk france china india pakistan north korea..........possibly israel greatest terrorist threat is very much low tech Mark L Last edited by ebandit; 23-04-2017 at 05:03 PM. Reason: kill the extra i |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
There has been talk of small scale tactical nukes though.If one sides forces are getting hammered.Obviously you wouldn't use it against another nuclear power like Russia or China but i could see Trump using against NK or Iran. |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Yes, I can see that on the cards, I always thought George Bush jnr. was trigger happy but Trump makes him look like the milky bar kid in comparison.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
I always felt (and even moreso now considering some of what he's said since leaving office) that Bush was little more than a figurehead. There are always people behind the scenes pulling the strings but I think Bush was essentially pretty much never acting on his own decisions, it was all driven by advisors. Trump is increasingly looking like a loose cannon.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
I wonder if China would rather go in themselves and sort Kim Jong out than let America go in and increase their sphere of influence in the area.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Moment
|
What would be the point? I mean, we'd all pretty much be dust, and the world would be in ruin, what is the point in contributing to the end of mankind with more nukes? By that point the world as we know it is over. Launching nukes at that point is just making sure all humans die.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
|||
|
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
Again I am reminded of a song from the 1960s I have on a cd by Barry Maguire. It's called Eve of Destruction. A line says, '' once the button is pushed,there's no running away,there'll be no one to save with the World in a grave''. Terrifying thought. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|