|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269
Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe BB18: Tom
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13,269
Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe BB18: Tom
|
So say the government want to put a two child cap on benefits to stop these people who think having kids is a career choice.
Should they
A - Just say that if a third child is conceived through rape then 'tough luck,Sorry no benefits for that kid'?
Or should they
B - Say 'no,we will fund that child as it's not the fault of the mother'?
If option B is the fairest then how do they go about differentiating between valid and false claimants?
I don't know the answer but if the government are in the wrong then what is the right answer?
Last edited by Northern Monkey; 28-04-2017 at 06:49 PM.
|
28-04-2017, 06:48 PM
Threaded Mode