FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
So say the government want to put a two child cap on benefits to stop these people who think having kids is a career choice.
Should they A - Just say that if a third child is conceived through rape then 'tough luck,Sorry no benefits for that kid'? Or should they B - Say 'no,we will fund that child as it's not the fault of the mother'? If option B is the fairest then how do they go about differentiating between valid and false claimants? I don't know the answer but if the government are in the wrong then what is the right answer? Last edited by Northern Monkey; 28-04-2017 at 06:49 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|