[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I have already explained why I couldn't copy the link across, but it is now there for all to see. As many do I quoted the bit I was objecting to and gave my opinion, so what exactly is your issue with that.

I've already said...

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I've already said...

Which did not take all the facts into account.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Which did not take all the facts into account.

It doesn't change the fact that, if you actually wanted to represent the actual story, then you could have typed out a sentence or two more from the article that balanced out your bias and gave us something solid to discuss.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It doesn't change the fact that, if you actually wanted to represent the actual story, then you could have typed out a sentence or two more from the article that balanced out your bias and gave us something solid to discuss.

Nope, I thought people would look it up as it is a subject many are interested in, on both sides of the argument. People want to see the full article - that is to be expected.

I also hoped someone would copy it across and they did quite early on in the thread, so many had access to it on which they could base their response.